The MED12 NM_005120.3:c.131G>A (NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61329353, n = 856 times), and lies in a statistically significant hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). Experimental evidence: Exact p.Gly44Asp showed reproducibly reduced Cyclin C/CDK8/CDK19 binding (AP-MS n=3) and independent cellular signaling abnormalities versus wild type. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be Likely Pathogenic.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.
This variantScenario
BenignPathogenic
Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.
In plain language
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.
About MED12
MED12 encodes a component of the Mediator protein complex, which helps control the initiation of gene transcription and activates CDK8 kinase. Inherited loss of MED12 function is associated with X-linked developmental disorders, including FG syndrome, Lujan-Fryns syndrome, and Ohdo syndrome. MED12 generally acts as a tumor suppressor, and its disruption has been linked to uterine leiomyomas and several benign breast tumors, as well as altered growth and survival of cancer cells.
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes.
Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a
confident-looking classification can still be wrong.
Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence
before relying on any call.
01The reasoning
How it was classified
The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
Recorded applied criteria
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.
28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 9 not met · 12 not assessed · 4 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
PM1 is met from the recurrent codon-44 hotspot evidence and absence of the variant from gnomAD; PS1 and PM5 are not established because the available reports do not provide qualifying pathogenic comparator variants.
PP2 and BP1 remain not assessed because the supplied evidence does not establish their required gene-level missense or truncating-variant premises.
PS2, PM6, PP1, and BS4 are not assessed because the available evidence contains no germline proband-parent testing, family pedigree, informative meioses, or affected-relative segregation data.
The exact MED12 c.131G>A / p.Gly44Asp variant has direct biochemical and cellular functional studies, including reproducible protein-complex disruption and independent abnormal signaling phenotypes.
The combined evidence supports PS3 at strong strength under the generic ACMG/AMP functional-study definition.
The same evidence is damaging rather than benign, so BS3 is not met; no neutral functional result was identified.
No VCEP covers MED12 in this case; the requested criteria were evaluated under generic ACMG/AMP rules.
The literature packet's PS4-indexed paper, PMID:26822237, was checked against its extracted full text and does not mention the exact queried variant.
No criterion outside PS4, PP4, PP5, BP5, and BP6 was adjudicated.
Generic ACMG/AMP rules govern because no VCEP covers MED12.
The variant is missense, so PP3 and BP4 are restricted to the REVEL path; REVEL is unavailable and neither SpliceAI nor uncalibrated BayesDel can substitute.
Population evidence supports PM2 at supporting strength; BA1 and BS1 are not met, and BS2 is not assessable because no healthy adult observation is documented.
PS3 is met at strong strength. Turunen et al. directly tested the exact MED12 p.Gly44Asp substitution corresponding to NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in engineered human 293T-REx cells and found a specific, reproducible reduction in binding of Cyclin C, CDK8, and CDK19 to mutant versus wild-type MED12 (AP-MS, n=3), with loss of kinase-module association while core Mediator association was retained. Immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation-Western analysis, recombinant kinase-module reconstitution, and in-vitro kinase assays provided orthogonal evidence of impaired MED12-Cyclin C-CDK8/19 interaction and reduced associated kinase activity. Independently, El Andaloussi et al. studied the exact c.131G>A construct in immortalized human uterine myometrial smooth-muscle cells and observed increased Wnt4/beta-catenin, S-phase and cyclin D1, increased total and phosphorylated mTOR, and altered autophagy markers compared with MED12 wild type. These variant-specific, controlled, mechanistically concordant functional results support a damaging effect on MED12. The studies are not validated clinical-diagnostic assays and use engineered or overexpression systems, but the direct biochemical assay with reproducibility and the independent cellular phenotype support the full PS3 code under the generic ACMG/AMP definition.
Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
Turunen et al. 2014 (PMID:24746821), Results/Fig. 1B-E: exact MED12 G44D was tested in engineered 293T-REx cells; AP-MS showed a specific and reproducible (n=3) reduction in Cyclin C, CDK8, and CDK19 binding to mutant versus wild-type MED12.
Turunen et al. 2014 (PMID:24746821), recombinant kinase-module and in-vitro kinase assays: MED12 exon 2 mutants including G44D disrupted Cyclin C-CDK8/19 interaction and reduced associated kinase activity.
El Andaloussi et al. 2020 (PMID:32046450), abstract and Figs. 2-5: exact MED12 c.131G>A was expressed in immortalized human uterine myometrial smooth-muscle cells and produced increased Wnt4/beta-catenin, S-phase fraction, cyclin D1, total/phosphorylated mTOR, and altered autophagy markers versus MED12 wild type.
Still missing
The available studies are research assays rather than validated functional tests reproduced in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
The cellular study uses ectopic overexpression in an immortalized uterine smooth-muscle cell line, which may not fully represent endogenous MED12 biology.
PM1ModerateACMG_2015Met: codon 44 contains 74% of reported MED12 mutations and is a statistically significant hotspot, with the variant absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
MED12 p.Gly44Asp is at codon 44, a recurrent MED12 exon 2 hotspot: 52 of 70 MED12 mutations in the breast phyllodes cohort involved codon 44 (74%), and the Cancer Hotspots result identifies MED12 G44 as a statistically significant hotspot. The exact variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, providing no observed population benign variation for this variant. The Cancer Hotspots extraction is flagged as partially parsed, so the hotspot record should receive human confirmation.
Rule
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Evidence considered
Ng et al. 2015, Discussion and Table 2: 70 of 112 breast phyllodes tumours had MED12 mutations, and 52 of those 70 mutations (74%) involved codon 44; the queried c.131G>A p.G44D was one of the codon-44 mutations.
Cancer Hotspots query MED12 G44: result states that this variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot; the extraction warns that the G44 hotspot row was only partially parsed.
gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 direct variant records: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is absent in both datasets.
Still missing
Human confirmation of the partially parsed Cancer Hotspots G44 record is recommended.
PM2SupportingACMG_2015Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, consistent with frequency <=0.0001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM2 is met at supporting strength. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A (MED12 p.Gly44Asp) was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, and was also absent from the available non-cancer cohort checks. The available datasets therefore provide an observed frequency of zero, which is below the generic PM2 supporting threshold of <=0.0001; no ancestry-specific or cohort-specific frequency artifact is present in the reported evidence.
Rule
Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 (exome): the variant was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
gnomAD v4.1: the variant was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check; no exome allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check; no genome allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
Generic calibration supplied for this case: PM2 supporting threshold <=0.0001, ClinGen SVI recommendation (PMID:25741868).
PS4ACMG_2015Not met: available studies report somatic cases but no variant-specific affected-versus-control comparison, so no PS4 odds ratio and confidence interval can be calculated.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS4 is not met. The PS4-indexed paper, PMID:26822237, was verified in its extracted full-text finding and does not mention MED12 c.131G>A or p.G44D; it reports MED12 mutations in 3 of 121 pediatric solid-tumor WES reports but provides neither variant-specific affected-case counts nor unaffected/population controls. PMID:26018969 reports the exact somatic variant in 18 of 112 breast phyllodes tumors (16.1%), and PMID:28771672 reports it in 3 CLL patients, but neither study supplies a matched control comparison for this variant or a case-control OR and 95% CI. The governing ACMG/AMP definition requires a significantly increased prevalence in affected individuals compared with controls; therefore no qualifying case-control evidence is present. No numeric comparison was performed because the required case and control counts for the queried variant were unavailable.
Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
PMID:26822237, Results, Tumor WES: the extracted full-text finding states that MED12 was present in 3 of 121 pediatric solid-tumor WES reports (2.5%), but the exact c.131G>A/p.G44D variant was not mentioned and no control frequency was reported.
PMID:26018969, Table 2: c.131G>A p.G44D was reported in 18 of 112 breast phyllodes tumors (16.1%); this was a somatic tumor cohort without an unaffected or population control comparator.
PMID:28771672, Table I: c.G131A p.G44D was reported in three CLL patients, with allele frequencies 1.00, 0.55, and N.A.; the study did not provide variant-specific controls or a case-control effect estimate.
The exact ACMG/AMP PS4 threshold is OR or RR >5.0 with a confidence interval that does not include 1.0, but the required variant-specific case and control counts were unavailable, so no inequality can be evaluated.
Still missing
A variant-specific case-control study or matched-ancestry case and control counts are needed to calculate an OR and 95% CI.
PP3ACMGNot met: this missense variant requires REVEL, but no REVEL score is available; SpliceAI and BayesDel cannot substitute for the applicable predictor path.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
Scope was settled first: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is a missense variant, p.(Gly44Asp), so the generic PP3/BP4 rule permits the REVEL path only. No REVEL score is available for this variant. The available BayesDel score cannot be used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established, and the SpliceAI result cannot be substituted for the missense path. Therefore PP3 is not met.
Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... An indeterminate result on the applicable path means PP3/BP4 are simply not met.
Evidence considered
Variant normalization identifies NM_005120.3:c.131G>A as missense, NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp), in exon 2.
The applicable generic missense predictor path is REVEL only; no REVEL score was available for this variant.
BayesDel score 0.551967 was not used because the supplied generic rule states that no ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
SpliceAI was not used because a splice prediction is not evidence for PP3 for a missense variant.
Still missing
A calibrated REVEL score for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is unavailable.
PP5ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification; the record is labeled other with no assertion criteria.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP5 is not met. ClinVar variation 92220 records the queried MED12 c.131G>A (p.Gly44Asp) variant as 'other' with no assertion criteria provided and no expert-panel submission; the available submissions are ordinary laboratory or non-classifying somatic records, not an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification.
Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 92220 for NM_005120.3(MED12):c.131G>A (p.Gly44Asp): classification 'other', review status 'no assertion criteria provided', and zero expert-panel submissions.
The exact-variant ClinVar record includes a clinical-laboratory submission classified as 'other' and other somatic/non-classifying submissions; none is an expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic assertion.
BA1ACMG_2015Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, far below the >=5% BA1 frequency threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BA1 is not met. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A (MED12 p.Gly44Asp) was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, including the available non-cancer cohort checks, so the filtering allele frequency is below the generic stand-alone benign threshold of >=0.05. No population frequency, ancestry-specific elevation, or high-frequency threshold artifact supports BA1.
Rule
Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 (exome): NM_005120.3:c.131G>A was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
gnomAD v4.1: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check; no exome allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check; no genome allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
Generic calibration supplied for this case: BA1 stand-alone threshold >=0.05, ACMG/AMP 2015 (PMID:25741868).
BS1ACMGNot met: the variant is absent from all reported gnomAD datasets, providing no allele frequency above the generic >=1% BS1 default.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS1 is not met. The variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, as well as the available non-cancer cohort checks, so there is no observed allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder and no frequency basis for the generic >=0.01 default. A maximum-credible-frequency calculation is unnecessary because the observed frequency is zero in the available reference datasets.
Rule
Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 (exome): the variant was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
gnomAD v4.1: the variant was absent; no allele count, allele frequency, or grpmax FAF was reported.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check.
GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER: the variant was absent from the non-cancer check.
Generic calibration supplied for this case: BS1 default threshold >=0.01; per-gene maximum-credible-frequency assessment is preferred (Whiffin et al. 2017, PMID:28518168).
BS3ACMG_2015Not met: exact p.Gly44Asp reduced MED12-associated CDK8/19 activity and altered cellular signaling rather than showing no damaging effect.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS3 is not met. The exact variant has variant-specific functional evidence showing impaired MED12 protein-complex interaction, reduced associated CDK8/19 kinase activity, and abnormal cellular signaling relative to wild-type MED12, rather than evidence of no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. No well-established assay in the reviewed sources demonstrated a normal functional result for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A / p.Gly44Asp.
Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
Turunen et al. 2014 (PMID:24746821) directly reports reduced mutant MED12 binding to Cyclin C, CDK8, and CDK19 and impaired associated kinase activity for G44D-containing MED12 exon 2 mutants.
El Andaloussi et al. 2020 (PMID:32046450) directly reports abnormal Wnt4/beta-catenin, cell-cycle, mTOR, and autophagy phenotypes in cells expressing MED12 c.131G>A compared with MED12 wild type.
BP4ACMGNot met: this missense variant requires REVEL, but no REVEL score is available; SpliceAI and BayesDel cannot substitute for the applicable predictor path.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
Scope was settled first: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is a missense variant, p.(Gly44Asp), so the generic PP3/BP4 rule permits the REVEL path only. No REVEL score is available for this variant, making the applicable path indeterminate. The available SpliceAI result cannot be substituted for the missense path, and BayesDel has no generic ACMG-strength calibration. Therefore BP4 is not met.
Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... An indeterminate result on the applicable path means PP3/BP4 are simply not met.
Evidence considered
Variant normalization identifies NM_005120.3:c.131G>A as missense, NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp), in exon 2.
The applicable generic missense predictor path is REVEL only; no REVEL score was available for this variant, so the BP4 path is indeterminate.
BayesDel score 0.551967 was not used because the supplied generic rule states that no ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
SpliceAI was not used because a splice prediction is not evidence for BP4 for a missense variant.
Still missing
A calibrated REVEL score for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is unavailable.
BP5ACMG_2015Not met: no disease case is documented with an established alternate molecular basis; somatic tumor reports alone do not satisfy BP5.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP5 is not met. The evidence reports the queried variant in somatic tumor cohorts and experimental tumor-cell models, but does not document a patient with a defined disease who has an established alternate molecular basis for that disease. Somatic occurrence or a tumor-study context alone does not satisfy BP5.
Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
PMID:26018969 and PMID:28771672 report the variant in somatic tumor cohorts but do not establish an alternate molecular cause for an individual patient's disease.
PMID:32046450 uses engineered uterine myometrial cells expressing MED12 c.131G>A and reports cellular effects; it is not a clinical case with an alternate molecular basis.
BP6ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar provides no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign classification, only an other label without assertion criteria.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP6 is not met. ClinVar variation 92220 does not contain an exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign classification; its classification is 'other' with no assertion criteria provided and no expert-panel submission. Ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions cannot trigger BP6.
Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 92220 for NM_005120.3(MED12):c.131G>A (p.Gly44Asp): classification 'other', review status 'no assertion criteria provided', and zero expert-panel submissions.
The available ClinVar submissions are not an exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign assertion, so they cannot trigger BP6.
PS1ACMG_2015Not assessed: p.Gly44Asp is reported, but no supplied source establishes that same amino-acid change as pathogenic.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The queried variant is MED12 c.131G>A, p.Gly44Asp, and the literature reports this same amino-acid change. However, the supplied ClinVar record is classified as "other" with no assertion criteria, and the papers do not establish p.Gly44Asp as a pathogenic variant. Therefore, the required previously established pathogenic comparator for PS1 is not available.
Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. ... Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 92220 for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A (p.Gly44Asp): classification other; no assertion criteria provided.
Ng et al. 2015, Table 2, row MED12 c.131G>A p.G44D: the exact same amino-acid change was observed in 18 of 112 breast phyllodes tumours (16.1%), but the cited row does not establish a germline pathogenic classification.
Wu et al. 2017, Table I: the exact p.G44D change was reported in three CLL patients; this is recurrence evidence, not a prior pathogenic assertion.
Still missing
A prior independent pathogenic classification for MED12 p.Gly44Asp is required.
PS2ACMG_2015Not assessed: no evidence documents a germline de novo variant with both maternity and paternity confirmed in an affected proband.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No clinical proband report with confirmed maternity and paternity, de novo status, disease phenotype, and absence of family history was identified. The available exact-variant literature concerns somatic tumor cohorts or engineered cell models and does not establish a germline de novo event.
Rule
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
No case-level evidence in the reviewed materials documents confirmed maternity, confirmed paternity, a germline de novo occurrence, and no family history for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A (MED12 p.Gly44Asp).
The exact-variant papers reviewed describe somatic tumor findings or engineered cellular assays rather than germline trio testing.
Still missing
A clinical proband report is needed.
Maternity and paternity confirmation are needed.
The proband's disease phenotype and family-history status are needed.
PM3ACMG_2015Not assessed: no second pathogenic MED12 variant with confirmed trans phase is documented in an affected germline proband.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM3 cannot be assessed because the available evidence does not document an affected proband with a second pathogenic MED12 variant, parental or offspring testing, or confirmed trans phase. The available exact-variant publications describe somatic tumor observations or engineered-cell experiments and do not establish the recessive inheritance context or biallelic germline state required for this criterion.
Rule
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant
Evidence considered
PMID:26018969, Table 2: MED12 c.131G>A (p.G44D) was reported in 18 of 112 breast phyllodes tumors; the study used tumor DNA and provides no germline inheritance or phase information.
PMID:28771672, Table I: MED12 c.G131A (p.G44D) was reported in three chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients; these are somatic tumor observations and no parental testing or phase is reported.
PMID:32046450: the exact variant was evaluated in engineered immortalized uterine myometrial cells, with no patient-level observations, segregation, or phase data.
No available evidence establishes a second pathogenic MED12 allele in trans in an affected germline proband.
Still missing
An affected germline proband with a second pathogenic MED12 variant
Parental or offspring testing establishing trans phase
A defined recessive MED12 disorder context for the proband
PM5ACMG_2015Not assessed: available reports show the same p.Gly44Asp change, but no different pathogenic missense change at residue 44.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The supplied literature reports the queried p.Gly44Asp change repeatedly, but no different missense substitution at residue 44 is identified as pathogenic. The recurrence of the same p.Gly44Asp change cannot satisfy PM5, and the available evidence does not establish a qualifying alternate missense comparator.
Rule
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. ... Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.
Evidence considered
Ng et al. 2015, Table 2: reports MED12 c.131G>A p.G44D, not a different missense change at residue 44.
Wu et al. 2017, Table I: reports p.G44D in patients 5, 43, and 45, again the same amino-acid change rather than an alternate residue-44 missense comparator.
ClinVar variation 92220 provides no established pathogenic classification for the queried variant or a qualifying alternate residue-44 comparator.
Still missing
A different missense substitution at MED12 residue 44 with an established pathogenic determination is required.
PM6ACMG_2015Not assessed: no clinical report supports an assumed de novo occurrence without parental maternity and paternity confirmation.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No clinical proband report was identified that supports an assumed de novo occurrence of the variant. The available exact-variant literature does not provide parental testing or a germline family-based observation from which de novo status could be assumed.
Rule
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Evidence considered
No case-level evidence in the reviewed materials reports the variant in an affected proband as assumed de novo or describes parental testing results.
The exact-variant literature reviewed is somatic or experimental and does not provide a germline de novo observation.
Still missing
A clinical proband report is needed.
Evidence supporting de novo status is needed, even if maternity and paternity are unconfirmed.
PP1ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives or informative meioses are reported to demonstrate cosegregation of the variant with disease.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No affected family members, informative meioses, or variant-positive and variant-negative relatives with phenotype data were reported. The available exact-variant studies are somatic tumor cohorts or cell-based experiments and cannot establish cosegregation in a disease family.
Rule
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease.
Evidence considered
No family-based segregation data, affected-relative genotypes, or informative meioses were identified for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A.
The reviewed exact-variant sources report somatic tumor observations or engineered cellular assays, not cosegregation in affected family members.
Still missing
A family pedigree with clinically characterized relatives is needed.
Genotype results for affected and unaffected relatives are needed.
The disease association for MED12 in the specific family must be established.
PP2ACMG_2015Not assessed: the supplied evidence lacks both a gene-wide low-benign-missense metric and a qualifying common missense disease-mechanism demonstration.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The supplied evidence documents recurrent MED12 missense mutations in somatic tumours and functional effects of p.Gly44Asp, but it does not provide a gene-wide measure showing a low rate of benign missense variation together with evidence that missense variants are a common disease mechanism in the relevant disease context. Both required PP2 components therefore remain unestablished.
Rule
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Still missing
Gene-wide evidence for low benign missense variation is required.
Disease-context evidence that missense variants are a common mechanism is required.
PP4ACMG_2015Not assessed: no patient phenotype or family-history description is available to evaluate specificity for a single-gene disease.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP4 was not assessed because the supplied evidence contains no patient-level phenotype or family-history description for the queried variant and no defined single-gene disease phenotype against which specificity can be judged.
Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Still missing
Patient-level clinical phenotype and family-history information, linked to the queried variant, are required.
BS2ACMG_2015Not assessed: no healthy adult carrier or hemizygote observation is documented for this variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. The case contains no documented observation of this variant in a healthy adult individual, and the available gnomAD records report absence rather than healthy-carrier or healthy-hemizygote observations. The inheritance model, expected penetrance, and age-of-onset requirements for a specific MED12 disorder are also not established in the case evidence.
Rule
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Evidence considered
The available gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 records report the variant as absent and do not provide a healthy adult observation, genotype, or phenotype assessment.
No case-specific healthy adult carrier, hemizygote, or homozygote observation was supplied.
Still missing
A documented healthy adult observation of the variant with age, zygosity or hemizygosity, phenotype status, and disease-specific penetrance context is missing.
BS4ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives without the variant or other family testing data are reported to demonstrate lack of segregation.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No affected family members were reported who lacked the variant, and no pedigree or family testing data were identified. Therefore, lack of segregation cannot be evaluated; the available somatic and experimental studies do not provide evidence for BS4.
Rule
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Evidence considered
No affected relative reported in the reviewed materials was shown to be negative for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A.
No family-level genotype and phenotype data were available to distinguish true non-segregation from phenocopy or locus heterogeneity.
Still missing
A clinically characterized family pedigree is needed.
Genotype results from affected relatives are needed to assess non-segregation.
Potential phenocopies and additional pathogenic variants would need consideration if non-segregation were observed.
BP1ACMG_2015Not assessed: the supplied materials do not establish that MED12 disease is caused primarily by truncating variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The supplied materials do not establish that MED12 disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. They contain reports of MED12 missense mutations and general disease-mechanism context, but no sufficiently characterized variant spectrum demonstrating the BP1 gene-level premise.
Rule
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Still missing
A characterized disease-associated MED12 variant spectrum showing primarily truncating causation is required.
BP2ACMG_2015Not assessed: no pathogenic MED12 variant in confirmed trans or cis phase is documented in a qualifying germline observation.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP2 cannot be assessed because the available evidence does not document this variant with a pathogenic variant in trans in a fully penetrant dominant MED12 disorder or with a pathogenic variant in cis in any inheritance context. The exact-variant publications report somatic tumor findings or cell experiments without germline phase, cis/trans status, or a qualifying dominant proband observation.
Rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
PMID:26018969, Table 2: the exact variant was observed in breast phyllodes tumor DNA, but no second variant, germline status, or cis/trans phase was reported.
PMID:28771672, Table I: the exact variant was observed in CLL tumor samples, but no pathogenic second allele or phase information was reported.
PMID:32046450: the exact variant was tested in an engineered cell model and the study reported no patient-level or segregation evidence.
No available evidence establishes the cis or trans relationship required by BP2.
Still missing
A qualifying fully penetrant dominant MED12 disorder context for trans interpretation, or any inheritance context for cis interpretation
A second pathogenic MED12 variant
Molecular phasing establishing cis or trans status
Not applicable · 4· recorded as not applicableShow reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴PVS1N/ANot applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in MED12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PVS1 for MED12, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
PM4N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in MED12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM4 for MED12, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
BP3N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in MED12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP3 for MED12, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
BP7N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in MED12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for MED12, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Identifiers
Gene
MED12
Transcript
NM_005120.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_005120.3:c.131G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp)
GRCh38
chrX:71119404 G>A
GRCh37
chrX:70339254 G>A
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense
ClinVar
92220
COSMIC
COSV61329353
Gene diagram
Every interpreted variant in MED12, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_005120.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.
MED12NM_005120.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Exons
—
Transcript span
—
Strand
—
Variants mapped
—
Source
UCSC ncbiRefSeqCurated
All variants in MED12—Select a row to find it on the plot; use the link to open its page.
Protein
Location
Classification
Link
gnomAD v4.1Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0Allele count data not recorded
Statements
gnomAD v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
gnomAD-Canada
Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI and Pangolin
SpliceAI acceptor lossat -65 bp
0.037
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +287 bp
0.005
SpliceAI donor lossat +478 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor gainat -456 bp
0.002
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.030
Pangolin splice gain
0.027
Other predictors
REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
0.552
How the predictions were used
PP3ACMGNot met: this missense variant requires REVEL, but no REVEL score is available; SpliceAI and BayesDel cannot substitute for the applicable predictor path.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
Scope was settled first: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is a missense variant, p.(Gly44Asp), so the generic PP3/BP4 rule permits the REVEL path only. No REVEL score is available for this variant. The available BayesDel score cannot be used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established, and the SpliceAI result cannot be substituted for the missense path. Therefore PP3 is not met.
Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... An indeterminate result on the applicable path means PP3/BP4 are simply not met.
Evidence considered
Variant normalization identifies NM_005120.3:c.131G>A as missense, NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp), in exon 2.
The applicable generic missense predictor path is REVEL only; no REVEL score was available for this variant.
BayesDel score 0.551967 was not used because the supplied generic rule states that no ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
SpliceAI was not used because a splice prediction is not evidence for PP3 for a missense variant.
Still missing
A calibrated REVEL score for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is unavailable.
BP4ACMGNot met: this missense variant requires REVEL, but no REVEL score is available; SpliceAI and BayesDel cannot substitute for the applicable predictor path.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
Scope was settled first: NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is a missense variant, p.(Gly44Asp), so the generic PP3/BP4 rule permits the REVEL path only. No REVEL score is available for this variant, making the applicable path indeterminate. The available SpliceAI result cannot be substituted for the missense path, and BayesDel has no generic ACMG-strength calibration. Therefore BP4 is not met.
Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... An indeterminate result on the applicable path means PP3/BP4 are simply not met.
Evidence considered
Variant normalization identifies NM_005120.3:c.131G>A as missense, NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp), in exon 2.
The applicable generic missense predictor path is REVEL only; no REVEL score was available for this variant, so the BP4 path is indeterminate.
BayesDel score 0.551967 was not used because the supplied generic rule states that no ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
SpliceAI was not used because a splice prediction is not evidence for BP4 for a missense variant.
Still missing
A calibrated REVEL score for NM_005120.3:c.131G>A is unavailable.
BP7N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_005120.3:c.131G>A in MED12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005111.2:p.(Gly44Asp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for MED12, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Statement
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04). BayesDel score = 0.551967.
6 paper records listed. 3 cited in the classification.
This study directly tested MED12 G44D, corresponding to NM_005120.3:c.131G>A and p.Gly44Asp. In engineered human 293T-REx cells, mutant MED12 showed reduced binding to Cyclin C, CDK8, and CDK19 compared with wild type, with loss of kinase-module association but retained core Mediator association. Recombinant kinase-module reconstitution and in-vitro kinase assays further demonstrated impaired interaction and reduced associated kinase activity for MED12 exon 2 mutants including G44D.
Affinity-purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) revealed a specific and reproducible (n = 3) reduction in the binding of Cyclin C, CDK8 and CDK19 to mutant versus wild-type MED12.
Location Results and Discussion, ‘Uterine leiomyoma-linked mutations in MED12 disrupt its association with CycC-CDK8/19,’ first paragraph; Fig. 1B-E
MED12 is frequently mutated in breast phyllodes tumours: a study of 112 cases.
Ng CC et al. · 2015 Sep
MED12 c.131G>A, p.G44D, was identified in 18 of 112 breast phyllodes tumours (16.1%). Across the cohort, 70 of 112 tumours had MED12 mutations, and 52 of those 70 mutations involved codon 44 (74%), supporting recurrent hotspot status at the queried residue.
Location Table 2, “High frequency of MED12 exon 2 mutations in phyllodes tumours of breast”; Discussion paragraph beginning “In this series of breast phyllodes tumours”
Context Cohort of 112 breast phyllodes tumours; ultra-deep targeted amplicon sequencing of MED12 exon 2 using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour DNA and Illumina MiSeq sequencing.
Introduction of Somatic Mutation in MED12 Induces Wnt4/β-Catenin and Disrupts Autophagy in Human Uterine Myometrial Cell.
El Andaloussi A et al. · 2020 Mar
The paper studies MED12 c.131G>A in an engineered immortalized human uterine myometrial cell model and reports functional cellular effects, but it does not report patient-level observations, parental testing, pedigree data, or segregation.
Using an immortalized human uterine myometrial smooth muscle cell line (UtSM), we constitutively overexpressed either MED12-Wild Type or the most common MED12 somatic mutation (c.131G>A).
Location Abstract; Materials and Methods, “Generation of Stable MED12-WT and MED12-Mut UtSM Cell Lines”; Results, Figs. 2–5; Conclusion
Context Ectopic expression of MED12-WT or c.131G>A in stable populations and clones of an immortalized uterine myometrial smooth-muscle cell line, with biochemical, cell-cycle, gene-expression, and ultrastructural assays.
Other recorded publications
MED12 mutations and NOTCH signalling in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Wu B et al. · 2017
MED12 c.G131A, corresponding to p.G44D, was reported in three patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The study provides recurrence of the same amino-acid change but does not report a different pathogenic missense substitution at residue 44 or a formal pathogenic classification.
Results, Table I (Somatic mutations affecting MED12 identified in 188 CLL patients)
Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors.
Parsons DW et al. · 2016
The paper reports MED12 among genes with somatic mutations in pediatric solid-tumor whole-exome sequencing but does not explicitly mention the queried MED12 c.131G>A or p.G44D variant and provides no germline family segregation data.
Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
gnomAD v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
gnomAD-Canada
Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as other (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 92220)
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04). BayesDel score = 0.551967.
Functional
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.
Somatic
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61329353, n = 856 times).
Cancer Hotspots
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.