0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

IDH1 c.394C>G, p.Arg132Gly

NM_005896.4:c.394C>G NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly) Missense · exon 4 View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

The IDH1 NM_005896.4:c.394C>G (NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61615456, n = 278 times), and lies in a statistically significant hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). Experimental evidence: Endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G cells produced measurable 2HG, and IDH1 knockdown reduced accumulation, supporting altered pathogenic enzyme activity. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be Likely Pathogenic.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About IDH1

IDH1 encodes a cytoplasmic and peroxisomal enzyme that converts isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate and helps produce NADPH, supporting cellular metabolism and antioxidant processes. Altered IDH1 activity is associated with several cancers, including glioma, cholangiocarcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia. In cancer, abnormal IDH1 activity can produce D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which disrupts cellular enzymes that regulate DNA and histone modification and can promote tumor development.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 4 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 4
PS3Moderate
PS3 · moderate

Met at moderate strength: endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G cells produced measurable 2HG, and IDH1 knockdown reduced accumulation, supporting altered pathogenic enzyme activity.

PM1Moderate
PM1 · moderate

Met: IDH1 R132 is an active-site residue and statistically significant hotspot, with 0/1,613,198 gnomAD v4.1 alleles observed.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent, 0/1,613,198 alleles, below the PM2 supporting threshold of <=0.0001.

PP3Moderate
PP3 · moderate

Met at moderate strength: missense REVEL score 0.893 exceeds the PP3 threshold of 0.773.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Likely Pathogenic: PS3 moderate, PM1 moderate, PP3 moderate, and PM2 supporting satisfy the generic ACMG/AMP fallback rule for three moderate criteria.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
0 / 1,613,198 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 0 / 1,613,198 alleles. Recorded AF 0. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/251292 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.893 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.893. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, single submitter.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
278 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61615456, n = 278 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 5 not met · 15 not assessed · 4 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Functional evidence supports PS3 at moderate strength because an endogenous IDH1 R132G cellular model showed IDH1-dependent 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulation, while no benign functional result supports BS3.

No VCEP covers IDH1 in this case; generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules govern.

PS4 and BP5 remain not assessed because the supplied evidence lacks the exact case-level comparisons required by their definitions.

PP4 remains not assessed because case-level phenotype and family-history specificity are unavailable.

PP5 and BP6 are not met because the exact ClinVar record is a single-submitter somatic record without the required expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic or Benign/Likely benign classification.

The variant is missense, so PP3 and BP4 are adjudicated exclusively through REVEL under the supplied generic rule.

REVEL 0.893 meets the calibrated PP3 moderate threshold and does not meet any BP4 threshold.

Met · 4

PS3 ModerateACMG_2015Met at moderate strength: endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G cells produced measurable 2HG, and IDH1 knockdown reduced accumulation, supporting altered pathogenic enzyme activity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS3 is met at moderate strength. PMID:23264629 directly studied endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G in JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells, confirmed the mutation by Sequenom assay, measured cellular 2-hydroxyglutarate by GC-MS, and showed that knockdown of IDH1 impaired 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulation. This is a biologically relevant cellular assay with an endogenous variant context and perturbation controls, supporting an abnormal IDH1 function associated with the R132G allele. PMID:19935646 additionally reports that R132G shares the common ability of R132 substitutions to catalyze NADPH-dependent conversion of alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate, but its detailed experiments did not provide variant-specific R132G measurements. Moderate rather than strong strength is used because the direct R132G evidence is from a single research study and was not shown here to be validated, reproducible, and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23264629: JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells carried a naturally occurring endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G mutation confirmed by Sequenom assay; IDH1 knockdown impaired cellular 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulation measured by GC-MS, with protein expression assessed by Western blot.
  • PMID:19935646: the authors state that R132 substitutions including glycine share the ability to catalyze NADPH-dependent conversion of alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate, although detailed variant-specific R132G assay results were not reported.
Still missing
  • Independent replication of a direct R132G functional result was not identified.
  • Clinical-diagnostic-laboratory validation and reproducibility were not demonstrated in the reviewed evidence.
Sources
PM1 ModerateACMG_2015Met: IDH1 R132 is an active-site residue and statistically significant hotspot, with 0/1,613,198 gnomAD v4.1 alleles observed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant p.Arg132Gly lies at IDH1 residue R132. PMID:19935646 identifies R132 as an IDH1 active-site residue and reports that R132 substitutions share a common altered catalytic activity. PMID:29670690 likewise describes R132 as a key residue within the active site. The Cancer Hotspots result identifies IDH1 R132 as a statistically significant hotspot. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (0/251,292 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,613,198 alleles), providing the available population evidence against benign variation at this site. These findings satisfy the generic PM1 hotspot/critical-functional-site requirement, although the hotspot extraction is flagged for manual verification.

Rule
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:19935646 describes mutations at the IDH1 active site and specifically includes R132G among substitutions with altered catalytic activity.
  • PMID:29670690 describes IDH1 R132 as a key residue within the active site and reports activity of multiple IDH1-R132 mutants.
  • Cancer Hotspots result for IDH1 R132 states that the variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot; the extraction warns that the R132 row was only partially parsed.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 0/251,292 alleles and gnomAD v4.1 reports 0/1,613,198 alleles for NM_005896.4:c.394C>G.
Still missing
  • Cancer Hotspots reports partial parsing and should be manually verified against the saved screenshot.
Sources
PM2 SupportingACMGMet at supporting strength: the variant is absent, 0/1,613,198 alleles, below the PM2 supporting threshold of <=0.0001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at supporting strength. The variant is absent from the available gnomAD control datasets: 0/251,292 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 exomes and 0/1,613,198 total alleles in gnomAD v4.1, with zero homozygotes in both. The generic ClinGen SVI threshold supplied for PM2 supporting is <= 0.0001, and the observed allele frequency of 0 is below that threshold. No governing VCEP specified a non-cancer or exome-only subset, so the all-comers gnomAD totals were the applicable default; no non-cancer subset was present in the case evidence.

Rule
PM2 (supporting): <= 0.0001 — SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to Supporting (ClinGen SVI 2020) (PMID:25741868) ... Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 exomes: 0 alternate alleles among 251,292 alleles, AF 0, and 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: 0 alternate alleles among 1,613,198 total alleles, AF 0, and 0 homozygotes.
  • No VCEP covers IDH1 in this case; therefore the default all-comers GNOMAD_V2_1 and GNOMAD_V4_1 sources apply rather than a governing non-cancer subset.
  • The generic PM2 calibration supplied for this case is <= 0.0001 for supporting strength (ClinGen SVI 2020 recommendation, referenced in the case as PMID:25741868).
Sources
PP3 ModerateACMGMet at moderate strength: missense REVEL score 0.893 exceeds the PP3 threshold of 0.773. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_005896.4:c.394C>G is a missense variant, p.(Arg132Gly), so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; SpliceAI and BayesDel are not used for PP3 in this situation. REVEL is 0.893, meeting the supplied ClinGen SVI moderate PP3 threshold of >= 0.773 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997). Therefore PP3 is met at moderate strength.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only.
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence: missense, NM_005896.4:c.394C>G, NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly), in exon 4.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports score 0.893 for this variant.
  • The supplied generic ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns PP3 moderate at >= 0.773; this threshold is from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.301 and BayesDel 0.412827 were not counted because the missense rule selects REVEL only and BayesDel has no established generic ACMG-strength calibration.
Sources
revel

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP5 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion; its record is single-submitter somatic Oncogenic/Tier I - Strong. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not met. The exact variant ClinVar record is classified as somatic Oncogenic/Tier I - Strong with review status criteria provided, single submitter; it has no expert-panel classification and is not an exact-variant Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic expert-panel assertion. The available literature is independently inspectable, so the PP5 condition that evidence is unavailable for independent evaluation is also not satisfied.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 3764951 for NM_005896.4:c.394C>G (p.Arg132Gly): review status criteria provided, single submitter; classification Tier I - Strong; no expert-panel submission is recorded.
  • The exact-variant literature available for review includes full text, so it is not evidence unavailable for independent evaluation.
Sources
BA1 ACMGNot met: observed allele frequency is 0/1,613,198 in gnomAD v4.1, far below the generic BA1 threshold of >=0.05. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The variant has observed allele frequency 0/251,292 in gnomAD v2.1 exomes and 0/1,613,198 total alleles in gnomAD v4.1; no population has an elevated filtering allele frequency, and both observed frequencies are below the generic BA1 threshold of >= 0.05. The reported grpmax FAF is null in both datasets, so no popmax point estimate was used.

Rule
BA1 (stand-alone): >= 0.05 — ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele frequency (PMID:25741868) ... Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 exomes: 0 alternate alleles among 251,292 alleles; total AF 0; grpmax FAF not reported.
  • gnomAD v4.1: 0 alternate alleles among 1,613,198 total alleles; total AF 0; grpmax FAF not reported.
  • The generic BA1 calibration supplied for this case is >= 0.05 (ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele frequency, PMID:25741868).
Sources
BS1 ACMGNot met: observed allele frequency is 0/1,613,198 in gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not reach the generic BS1 threshold of >=0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met on the available population data. The variant was observed at 0/251,292 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 exomes and 0/1,613,198 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, with no elevated filtering allele frequency; therefore the allele frequency is not greater than expected for the disorder and does not reach the generic >= 0.01 default. A disorder-specific maximum-credible-frequency calculation is unnecessary because the observed frequency is zero; disease prevalence, penetrance, and allelic heterogeneity were not available for an independent calculation.

Rule
BS1 (strong): >= 0.01 — Generic SVI default; per-gene derivation preferred (Whiffin et al. 2017) (PMID:28518168) ... Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 exomes: 0 alternate alleles among 251,292 alleles; grpmax FAF not reported.
  • gnomAD v4.1: 0 alternate alleles among 1,613,198 total alleles; grpmax FAF not reported.
  • The generic BS1 default supplied for this case is >= 0.01; Whiffin et al. 2017 (PMID:28518168) is the cited framework for preferring a disorder-specific maximum credible allele frequency when an elevated frequency requires interpretation.
  • Because the observed allele frequency is zero, no prevalence, penetrance, or allelic-heterogeneity calculation is needed to reject BS1 from an elevated-frequency signal.
Sources
BP4 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.893 is above the BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_005896.4:c.394C>G is a missense variant, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; its SpliceAI result cannot substitute for an indeterminate or non-supportive REVEL result. REVEL is 0.893, which is above the supplied BP4 supporting threshold of <= 0.29 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only.
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence: missense, NM_005896.4:c.394C>G, NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly), in exon 4.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports score 0.893 for this variant.
  • The supplied generic ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns BP4 supporting at <= 0.29; this threshold is from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.301 was not counted because splice prediction is not the applicable path for a missense variant; BayesDel was not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP6 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion and instead records single-submitter somatic Oncogenic/Tier I - Strong. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not met. The exact variant ClinVar record has no expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; it is a single-submitter somatic Oncogenic/Tier I - Strong record. No exact-variant reputable benign assertion satisfying the required source type is available.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 3764951 for NM_005896.4:c.394C>G (p.Arg132Gly): review status criteria provided, single submitter; classification Tier I - Strong; no expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion is recorded.
Sources

Not assessed · 15 · no assessment recorded

PS1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: R132G is reported in cancer studies, but no supplied source establishes a previously observed R132G variant as ACMG/AMP pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). PMID:23264629 documents a naturally occurring IDH1 R132G mutation, and PMID:19935646 includes R132G among cancer-associated substitutions, but the supplied evidence does not establish that a previously observed R132G variant was an ACMG/AMP pathogenic variant. The ClinVar record is somatic and classified as Tier I - Strong rather than a germline pathogenic assertion. Therefore the same-amino-acid pathogenic comparator required for PS1 is not established.

Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23264629 reports a naturally occurring monoallelic IDH1 R132G mutation in JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells, but does not classify it as an ACMG/AMP pathogenic variant.
  • PMID:19935646 includes R132G among cancer-associated IDH1 substitutions, but this is not an established germline pathogenic classification.
  • ClinVar variation 3764951 is reported as somatic with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' and classification 'Tier I - Strong', not as a germline ACMG/AMP pathogenic assertion.
Still missing
  • An established pathogenic classification for a previously observed IDH1 R132G variant is required.
Sources
PS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no germline proband-parent testing or confirmed maternity and paternity establishes de novo occurrence in an affected patient. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No germline proband-parent testing, confirmed maternity and paternity, disease phenotype documentation, or family-history assessment is provided. The available records concern the somatic IDH1 p.Arg132Gly variant in cancer contexts and do not establish a de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease.

Rule
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence contains no germline pedigree, parental testing, maternity or paternity confirmation, or proband phenotype documentation for NM_005896.4:c.394C>G (IDH1 p.Arg132Gly).
  • The available variant-specific literature describes somatic cancer or cell-line observations rather than a germline de novo patient observation.
Still missing
  • Germline variant results for the proband and both biological parents
  • Confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Documented disease phenotype and absence of relevant family history
PS4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no exact-variant case-control counts or valid OR with 95% CI are available for comparison with the PS4 threshold OR >5.0 and CI excluding 1.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing PS4 rule requires a significant prevalence increase in affected individuals compared with controls; the supplied threshold guidance specifies OR or RR >5.0 with a confidence interval that does not include 1.0. The literature packet contains no qualifying case-control study for exact IDH1 c.394C>G (p.Arg132Gly). PMID:29860938 reports grouped R132G/L/S frequencies, not R132G alone, and provides no unaffected or population-control comparison; therefore an exact-variant OR and 95% CI cannot be validly computed. PMID:23264629 reports an R132G cell line, not a case-control cohort. gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 report 0 alternate alleles, but no exact-variant affected-case count or matched-ancestry case frequency is available. The required comparison is therefore unavailable rather than negative.

Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:29860938, Table 1 (continued), mutated IDH allele: R132G/L/S is grouped, with 12/78 (15%) in dose escalation and 27/180 (15%) in dose expansion; the table does not separate R132G or provide unaffected/population controls.
  • PMID:23264629, Experimental Procedures and Results: JJ012 cells have a monoallelic endogenous IDH1 R132G mutation; this is a cell-line experiment, not a case-control prevalence study.
  • gnomAD v2.1: exact variant 0/251,292 alleles; gnomAD v4.1: exact variant 0/1,613,198 alleles.
  • The governing numeric requirement is OR or RR >5.0 with a confidence interval that does not include 1.0; no valid exact-variant OR/RR and CI are available, so no substituted inequality is applicable.
Still missing
  • Exact IDH1 p.Arg132Gly affected-case count and denominator
  • Unaffected or matched-ancestry population-control count for the exact variant
  • A valid exact-variant OR or RR with 95% CI
Sources
PM3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected-proband observation, second pathogenic variant, parental testing, or phase result establishes a pathogenic variant in trans. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM3 cannot be assessed from the available case evidence. No affected-proband observation, second pathogenic variant, parental testing, or phase result establishes that NM_005896.4:c.394C>G is in trans with a pathogenic variant. The case materials also do not establish a recessive IDH1 disorder context or inheritance mode. Therefore, the required allelic relationship is unresolved rather than met or not met.

Rule
PM3: For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence identifies NM_005896.4:c.394C>G (p.Arg132Gly) in IDH1 but contains no documented affected-proband allelic observation, second pathogenic allele, parental testing, or phase result.
  • The case summary does not establish a recessive IDH1 disorder context or inheritance mode.
Still missing
  • Documented affected proband(s) with NM_005896.4:c.394C>G
  • A documented pathogenic or likely pathogenic allele in the same proband
  • Parental or offspring testing establishing trans phase
  • Confirmation that the relevant IDH1 disorder is recessive
PM5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: alternate R132 substitutions are reported, but none is established in the supplied evidence as a pathogenic comparator for PM5. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PMID:19935646 reports other substitutions at R132, including histidine, serine, cysteine, and leucine, but the supplied paper extraction does not establish any of those alternate missense variants as pathogenic variants under ACMG/AMP. The Cancer Hotspots, COSMIC, OncoKB, and somatic ClinVar evidence concerns cancer occurrence or oncogenicity and cannot by itself establish the required pathogenic comparator. A qualifying different pathogenic missense variant at residue 132 is therefore not established.

Rule
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:19935646 lists R132H, R132S, R132C, R132G, and R132L as cancer-associated substitutions with shared catalytic activity, but does not provide an ACMG/AMP pathogenic classification for an alternate R132 missense variant.
  • COSMIC reports somatic occurrence of the queried R132G variant, while OncoKB reports an oncogenic label; these do not establish a different pathogenic missense comparator at R132.
  • The ClinVar evidence is a somatic Tier I - Strong record for R132G and does not provide a qualifying alternate-residue pathogenic assertion.
Still missing
  • A different missense variant at residue 132 with an established pathogenic classification is required.
Sources
PM6 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected germline proband or parental testing supports an assumed de novo occurrence without confirmed maternity and paternity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No germline patient observation with evidence of assumed de novo status is provided. In particular, the available records do not document an affected proband, parental testing, or the absence of confirmed maternity and paternity needed to distinguish PM6 from PS2.

Rule
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Evidence considered
  • No germline proband-parent segregation or de novo testing result is present for this variant.
  • The available papers report somatic IDH1 R132G in cancer cell lines or grouped cancer cohorts and do not document an assumed de novo germline case.
Still missing
  • Germline variant result in an affected proband
  • Parental testing or other evidence supporting de novo status
  • Documentation that maternity and paternity were not both confirmed
PP1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives or informative meioses are documented to evaluate co-segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected family members, informative meioses, genotype results, phenotype assessments, or segregation pattern are documented. Therefore, co-segregation cannot be evaluated, and no stronger PP1 level can be assigned.

Rule
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. ... May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence contains no family pedigree, affected-relative testing, phenotype concordance data, or meiosis count for NM_005896.4:c.394C>G.
  • The literature reviewed for this case reports somatic cancer cohorts or cell-line experiments, not familial germline co-segregation.
Still missing
  • Family pedigree with affected relatives and phenotypes
  • Variant testing results for affected and unaffected relatives
  • Number of informative meioses and segregation direction
PP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no supplied evidence establishes both low benign missense variation and a common germline missense disease mechanism for IDH1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The supplied evidence does not provide a gene-level assessment showing that IDH1 has a low rate of benign missense variation, nor does it establish a germline disease context in which missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. The available evidence is primarily somatic oncology evidence and cannot supply both PP2 conditions.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Still missing
  • A gene-level benign missense constraint assessment is required.
  • A documented disease mechanism showing that IDH1 missense variants commonly cause the relevant disease is required.
PP4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no case-level phenotype or family history is available to determine whether it is highly specific for a single-genetic-etiology disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No patient phenotype, family history, or disease-specific clinical presentation is supplied for this case. The available records describe somatic IDH1 R132G in a chondrosarcoma cell line and grouped IDH1 R132G/L/S in an AML treatment cohort, but do not establish that this patient's phenotype is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. PP4 cannot be assessed without case-level phenotype and diagnostic context.

Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • No case-level phenotype or family-history data are present in the supplied evidence.
  • PMID:23264629 and PMID:29860938 provide experimental or grouped somatic oncology context, not a phenotype-specific assessment for this case.
Still missing
  • Case-level clinical phenotype and diagnosis
  • Relevant family history or phenotype specificity information
  • Evidence that the disease has a single genetic etiology
Sources
BS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no qualifying healthy-adult carrier or homozygote observation was provided for the BS2 requirement. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not assessed. The available gnomAD records show zero variant alleles and zero homozygotes, but population absence cannot establish that this variant was observed in a healthy adult individual. No qualifying healthy-adult heterozygote, homozygote, or hemizygote observation, inheritance model, or evidence that full penetrance is expected at an early age was provided.

Rule
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: 0 alternate alleles and 0 homozygotes among 251,292 alleles.
  • gnomAD v4.1: 0 alternate alleles and 0 homozygotes among 1,613,198 alleles.
  • These population counts do not document a qualifying healthy adult carrying the variant and cannot be converted into BS2 evidence.
Still missing
  • A documented healthy adult carrying the variant in the genotype state required by the disease inheritance model.
  • The relevant disease inheritance model and confirmation that full penetrance is expected at an early age.
Sources
BS3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no well-established assay in the reviewed evidence demonstrates that IDH1 R132G has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No reviewed functional study demonstrates that IDH1 R132G has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. The available direct R132G study instead reports cellular 2-hydroxyglutarate production and its dependence on IDH1 activity, while the other reviewed studies do not provide a benign functional result for this variant. Therefore BS3 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23264629: the direct R132G cellular study reports 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulation and does not show a benign or functionally normal result.
  • PMID:19935646: R132G is discussed as sharing a neomorphic 2-hydroxyglutarate-producing capability; no benign R132G assay result is reported.
  • PMID:29670690: functional profiling concerns other IDH1-R132 mutants and does not explicitly report IDH1 R132G.
  • PMID:29860938: R132G is grouped with R132L/S in clinical baseline data, not evaluated by a benign functional assay.
Still missing
  • A validated, appropriately controlled assay showing no damaging effect of IDH1 R132G on protein function or splicing is unavailable.
Sources
BS4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives with genotype and phenotype data are available to demonstrate lack of segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected family members carrying or lacking the variant are documented, so lack of segregation cannot be demonstrated. The available somatic cancer and cell-line records do not provide a familial phenotype-genotype comparison and cannot support BS4.

Rule
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Evidence considered
  • No familial genotype-phenotype data are present for this variant, including affected relatives who test negative.
  • The available variant-specific records concern somatic cancer or cell-line observations and do not establish familial non-segregation.
Still missing
  • Affected family members evaluated for the disease phenotype
  • Genotype results for those affected relatives
  • Assessment for phenocopies or more than one pathogenic variant in the family
BP1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the supplied evidence does not establish that IDH1 disease is primarily caused by truncating variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The supplied case materials do not establish that IDH1-related disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. The gene-level loss-of-function context is explicitly unresolved, and the available literature and database records concern somatic IDH1 missense mutations rather than a disease series demonstrating a predominantly truncating mechanism.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Still missing
  • A disease-specific variant spectrum demonstrating that truncating variants primarily cause disease is required.
BP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no documented pathogenic variant in trans for a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis in any inheritance pattern. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP2 cannot be assessed from the available case evidence. No documented pathogenic variant is shown in trans with NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in a fully penetrant dominant disorder, and no documented pathogenic variant is shown in cis with it in any inheritance pattern. The available cancer and database records do not provide the required germline phase or affected-proband evidence.

Rule
BP2: Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence contains no documented germline pathogenic variant paired with NM_005896.4:c.394C>G and no phase result establishing cis or trans configuration.
  • The available ClinVar and cancer-context records do not document the allelic observations required for BP2.
Still missing
  • A documented pathogenic variant paired with NM_005896.4:c.394C>G
  • Phase testing establishing trans or cis configuration
  • For a trans observation, confirmation of a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder
BP5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the available records do not document an individual carrying exact R132G who has an alternate molecular basis for disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case report or clinical record establishes that this variant was found in a patient with an alternate molecular basis for disease. PMID:23264629 concerns a cell line with endogenous R132G, and PMID:29860938 reports grouped R132G/L/S in an AML cohort without documenting an alternate molecular diagnosis for an individual carrying exact R132G. The BP5 evidence requirement is therefore unresolved.

Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23264629 reports an endogenous IDH1 R132G mutation in JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells, not a patient with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
  • PMID:29860938 reports grouped R132G/L/S frequencies in AML treatment cohorts and does not document an alternate molecular basis for an exact R132G carrier.
Still missing
  • A patient-level report linking exact p.Arg132Gly to an alternate molecular diagnosis or cause of disease
Sources
Not applicable · 4· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in IDH1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PVS1 for IDH1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in IDH1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM4 for IDH1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in IDH1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP3 for IDH1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in IDH1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for IDH1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
IDH1
Transcript
NM_005896.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_005896.4:c.394C>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly)
GRCh38
chr2:208248389 G>C
GRCh37
chr2:209113113 G>C
Location and type
Exon 4 · missense
COSMIC
COSV61615456

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in IDH1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_005896.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

IDH1NM_005896.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 0 / 1,613,198 alleles AF 0 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 0 / 251,292 alleles AF 0 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0 · 0 / 1,613,198 alleles · 0 hom
No alternate alleles recorded in the displayed ancestry groups.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0 · 0 / 251,292 alleles · 0 hom
No alternate alleles recorded in the displayed ancestry groups.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/1613198 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/74792 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/251292 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +260 bp
0.008
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -75 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -20 bp
0.108
SpliceAI donor gainat +34 bp
0.301
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.108
Pangolin splice gain
0.142

Other predictors

REVEL
0.893
BayesDel
0.413

How the predictions were used

PP3 ModerateACMGMet at moderate strength: missense REVEL score 0.893 exceeds the PP3 threshold of 0.773. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_005896.4:c.394C>G is a missense variant, p.(Arg132Gly), so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; SpliceAI and BayesDel are not used for PP3 in this situation. REVEL is 0.893, meeting the supplied ClinGen SVI moderate PP3 threshold of >= 0.773 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997). Therefore PP3 is met at moderate strength.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only.
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence: missense, NM_005896.4:c.394C>G, NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly), in exon 4.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports score 0.893 for this variant.
  • The supplied generic ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns PP3 moderate at >= 0.773; this threshold is from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.301 and BayesDel 0.412827 were not counted because the missense rule selects REVEL only and BayesDel has no established generic ACMG-strength calibration.
Sources
revel
BP4 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.893 is above the BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_005896.4:c.394C>G is a missense variant, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; its SpliceAI result cannot substitute for an indeterminate or non-supportive REVEL result. REVEL is 0.893, which is above the supplied BP4 supporting threshold of <= 0.29 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only.
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence: missense, NM_005896.4:c.394C>G, NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly), in exon 4.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports score 0.893 for this variant.
  • The supplied generic ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns BP4 supporting at <= 0.29; this threshold is from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.301 was not counted because splice prediction is not the applicable path for a missense variant; BayesDel was not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_005896.4:c.394C>G in IDH1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_005887.2:p.(Arg132Gly). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for IDH1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.30). REVEL score = 0.893. BayesDel score = 0.412827.

4 paper records listed. 3 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate.
    The paper identifies IDH1 R132 as an active-site residue and includes R132G among substitutions that share the ability to catalyze NADPH-dependent conversion of alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. It also discusses other R132 substitutions, but does not establish an ACMG/AMP pathogenic classification for any alternate missense comparator.
    → PS3 · moderate → PM1 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 19935646 ↗
    Source detail
    These data also demonstrate that mutation of R132 to histidine, serine, cysteine, glycine, or leucine share a common ability to catalyze the NADPH-dependent conversion of αKG to 2HG.

    Location Discussion, final paragraph

    Context Discussion of recombinant IDH1 mutant enzyme studies; detailed assays were reported for R132H, R132C, R132L, and R132S, while R132G was included in the general summary of R132 substitutions.

  • The potential for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations to produce 2-hydroxyglutarate depends on allele specificity and subcellular compartmentalization.
    The paper explicitly reports a naturally occurring endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G mutation in JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells and describes the cellular 2-hydroxyglutarate phenotype associated with mutant IDH1. It does not provide an ACMG/AMP pathogenic classification.
    → PS3 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 23264629 ↗
    Source detail
    JJ012 cells have a monoallelic endogenous IDH1 R132G mutation that has previously been reported (26), which we confirmed by Sequenom assay.

    Location Experimental Procedures, Cell Culture and Reagents; Results, “Impairing Mitochondrial IDH Flux Increases 2HG Production from Mutant IDH1 in the Cytosol,” including Fig. 4

    Context Endogenous monoallelic IDH1 R132G in JJ012 chondrosarcoma cells; siRNA knockdown experiments with cellular 2-hydroxyglutarate quantified by GC-MS.

  • Discovery of AG-120 (Ivosidenib): A First-in-Class Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor for the Treatment of IDH1 Mutant Cancers.
    The paper describes IDH1 R132 as a key residue within the active site and reports that AG-120 inhibited several IDH1-R132 mutants. The cited passage supports the critical active-site location but does not provide a variant-specific R132G pathogenic classification.
    → PM1 · moderate Does not name this variant
    PMID 29670690 ↗
    Source detail
    Somatic point mutations at a key arginine residue (R132) within the active site of the metabolic enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) confer a novel gain of function in cancer cells, resulting in the production of d-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite.

    Location Abstract

    Context Biochemical enzyme inhibition assays and cellular profiling of IDH1-R132 mutant models, including R132H and related R132 mutants.

Other recorded publications

  • Durable Remissions with Ivosidenib in IDH1-Mutated Relapsed or Refractory AML.
    The paper groups IDH1 p.R132G with R132L/S in baseline mutation data from an ivosidenib-treated AML cohort, but does not provide separate R132G functional, clinical, or outcome data.
    Names this variant
    PMID 29860938 ↗
    Quoted passage
    R132G/L/S Dose-escalation phase 4/33 (12) 5/35 (14) 12/78 (15) Dose-expansion phase 15/92 (16) 24/144 (17) 27/180 (15)

    Table 1 (continued), baseline characteristics, “Mutated IDH allele”

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/1613198 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/74792 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/251292 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar but submission details could not be extracted. (ClinVarID = 3764951)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.30). REVEL score = 0.893. BayesDel score = 0.412827.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61615456, n = 278 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.