Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
NTRK2
Final classification
VUS
PM2
NTRK2
c.2061C>A
p.His687Gln
This variant

NM_006180.4:c.2061C>A (p.His687Gln) is a missense variant in exon 19 of NTRK2. It is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2.

Transcript
NM_006180.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_006180.4:c.2061C>A
GRCh38
chr9:84955406 C>A
GRCh37
chr9:87570321 C>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
NTRK2 c.2061C>A

NM_006180.4:c.2061C>A (p.His687Gln) is a missense variant in exon 19 of NTRK2. It is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2.1 No functional studies, case reports, segregation data, de novo observations, or ClinVar classifications are available for this variant. No publications specifically mention NM_006180.4:c.2061C>A.2 Computational predictors are discordant: REVEL score 0.77 supports a deleterious effect, but BayesDel score 0.307 is borderline and does not provide a second concordant predictor to meet PP3. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00).3 With only PM2 (moderate) met, the evidence is insufficient to classify this variant as likely pathogenic or pathogenic under the ACMG/AMP 2015 framework (PMID:25741868). The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).4

PM2 VUS
3 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
4 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_006180.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
NTRK2 NM_006180.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 21 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate Pathogenic
NM_006180.4:c.2061C>A is absent from all population databases including gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, consistent with a rare variant. Allele frequency is well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes).Absent from gnomAD v4.1 (exomes/genomes).Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes).
Assessed · not applied · 21 not met · 0 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence of an established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.His687Gln) arising from a different nucleotide substitution.
PS2 No de novo observations (with maternity and paternity confirmed) have been reported for this variant.
PS3 No variant-specific functional studies are available.
PS4 No case-control studies or proband enrichment data are available.
PM1 While p.His687 lies within the NTRK2 tyrosine kinase domain (a well-established functional domain), the variant does not reside in a statistically significant mutational hotspot.
PM5 No pathogenic missense variants have been identified at the same amino acid residue (p.His687).
PM6 No assumed de novo observations (without maternity/paternity confirmation) have been reported for this variant.
PP1 No cosegregation data in affected families are available for this variant.
PP2 Insufficient evidence to establish that NTRK2 has a low rate of benign missense variation.
PP3 REVEL score 0.77 exceeds the 0.5 threshold and supports a deleterious effect, but BayesDel score 0.307 is borderline and does not provide a concordant strong pathogenic prediction.
PP4 No patient phenotype data are available.
Benign
BA1 Allele frequency does not exceed 1% in any population database.
BS1 Allele frequency does not exceed 0.3% in any population database.
BS2 The variant has not been observed in healthy adults.
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect are available.
BS4 No segregation data in affected families are available.
BP1 While loss-of-function variants in NTRK2 have been implicated in germline disease, there is insufficient evidence that NTRK2-associated disease is caused primarily by truncating variants to the exclusion of missense changes.
BP2 Not observed in trans (or cis) with a pathogenic variant.
BP4 REVEL score 0.77 predicts a deleterious effect, which contradicts benign computational predictions.
BP5 No observation of this variant in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
BP6 No reputable source reports this variant as benign.
N/A · 6 PVS1 · PM3 · PM4 · PP5 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.77. BayesDel score = 0.307499.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. NTRK2, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is altered by mutation or chromosomal rearrangement in a diverse range of cancers.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots