Back
NM_006231.4:c.1367C>T
p.Ala456Val · POLE
León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework · vleon-castillo-2020-custom-framework-v1
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2PP3
POLE
c.1367C>T
p.Ala456Val
This variant

The POLE c.1367C>T (p.Ala456Val) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV57673561, n=2) and has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_006231.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_006231.4:c.1367C>T
GRCh38
chr12:132673270 G>A
GRCh37
chr12:133249856 G>A
León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework for criterion specification, using ACMG/AMP 2015 final classification combination thresholds as defined in the explicit final-classification framework.
Classification rationale
PM2PP3 VUS
POLE c.1367C>T

The POLE c.1367C>T (p.Ala456Val) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV57673561, n=2) and has not been reported in ClinVar.1 The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, with an observed population frequency of 0 that is below the project's PM2 threshold of 0.1%.2 In León-Castillo Supplementary Table S3, p.Ala456Val is listed as likely disease causing with 0 benign in silico results, meeting the local POLE PP3 rule; SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.10.3

PM2 + PP3 VUS
3 vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_4spliceai ↗
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_006231.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
POLE NM_006231.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 21 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 Supporting review Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0 and is below the project's PM2 threshold of 0.1%.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
PP3 Supporting review Pathogenic
This variant is listed in León-Castillo Supplementary Table S3 as p.A456V with REVEL classified as likely disease causing and 0 benign in silico results, which meets the local POLE PP3 rule. SpliceAI also predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.10, supporting interpretation as a missense effect rather than a splice-disrupting variant.
Supplementary Table S3: A456V, REVEL class 'likely disease causing', benign in silico results = 0.SpliceAI max delta score = 0.10.
Assessed · not applied · 7 not met · 14 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No established pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change p.(Ala456Val) was identified, so PS1 is not met.
PS2 No confirmed de novo data with verified maternity and paternity were identified, so PS2 was not assessed.
PS3 No validated variant-specific functional study demonstrating a damaging effect for p.(Ala456Val) was identified in the available evidence, so PS3 was not assessed.
PS4 This variant has been reported in COSMIC 2 times, but the local POLE framework requires recurrence in both the COSMIC and TCGA endometrial carcinoma cohorts, a combined endometrial carcinoma count of at least 10, and membership in the established pathogenic set; these requirements are not met for p.(Ala456Val).
PM1 The local POLE framework does not allow PM1 based only on location in the exonuclease domain.
PM3 No trans data with another pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder context were identified, so PM3 was not assessed.
PM5 A different substitution at the same codon, p.(Ala456Pro), is included in the local POLE hotspot set, but the same residue also shows other non-equivalent substitutions in the supplementary tables, including p.A456G and p.A456V.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified, so PM6 was not assessed.
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so PP1 was not assessed.
PP2 Gene-level evidence required to determine whether missense variation is a common disease mechanism and benign missense variation is low was not identified, so PP2 was not assessed.
PP4 No phenotype data sufficiently specific for a single genetic etiology were identified, so PP4 was not assessed.
PP5 No reputable source classification for this exact variant was identified, so PP5 was not assessed.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0 and is below the benign stand-alone threshold of 1%.
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0 and is below the benign strong threshold of 0.3%.
BS2 No evidence showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a frequency inconsistent with disease penetrance was identified, so BS2 was not assessed.
BS3 No validated variant-specific functional study demonstrating no damaging effect for p.(Ala456Val) was identified, so BS3 was not assessed.
BS4 No segregation data showing lack of cosegregation with disease were identified, so BS4 was not assessed.
BP2 No phase data showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant were identified, so BP2 was not assessed.
BP4 The local POLE BP4 rule is not met because León-Castillo Supplementary Table S3 lists p.A456V as likely disease causing, not likely benign, and the benign in silico result count is 0 rather than at least 4.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation fully accounting for the phenotype was identified, so BP5 was not assessed.
BP6 No reputable source classified this exact variant as benign or likely benign, so BP6 was not assessed.
N/A · 5 PVS1 · PM4 · BP1 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.10).
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB has not reviewed this specific variant; no variant-level oncogenicity or biological effect is available. Gene-level context: POLE, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, is an enzyme involved in DNA replication and repair. Select POLE mutations lead to ultra-high m
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV57673561, n = 2 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots