Back
NM_006231.4:c.4006-15C>T
p.? · POLE
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2BP4
POLE
c.4006-15C>T
p.?
This variant

The variant is very rare in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 total AF 2.04127e-05 (0.00204%) and grpmax FAF 2.326e-05, which are below the generic PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%.

Transcript
NM_006231.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_006231.4:c.4006-15C>T
GRCh38
chr12:132649087 G>A
GRCh37
chr12:133225673 G>A
Conflicting supporting evidence under generic ACMG/AMP: PM2 is met for rarity and BP4 is met for benign computational splicing evidence.
Classification rationale
PM2 BP4 VUS
POLE c.4006-15C>T

The variant is very rare in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 total AF 2.04127e-05 (0.00204%) and grpmax FAF 2.326e-05, which are below the generic PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%.1 gnomAD v4.1 likewise shows a total AF of 1.44198e-05 (0.00144%) and grpmax FAF 3.005e-05, which remains below the generic PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1% and confirms that the variant is uncommon in the general population.2 SpliceAI predicts minimal splicing effect, with a maximum delta score of 0.03, which is below the splice-impact threshold of 0.2 and supports BP4.3 ClinVar contains a likely benign classification for this variant with single-submitter review status, which is concordant with a benign leaning but is not used as stand-alone classification evidence.4 Because the available data provide one supporting pathogenic criterion for rarity and one supporting benign criterion for computational evidence against splice disruption, NM_006231.4:c.4006-15C>T is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

PM2 + BP4 VUS
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_006231.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
POLE NM_006231.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 20 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 review Pathogenic
The variant is rare in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 total AF is 2.04127e-05 (0.00204%) with grpmax FAF 2.326e-05, and gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 1.44198e-05 (0.00144%) with grpmax FAF 3.005e-05; these values are below the generic PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%.
gnomAD v2.1 AF 2.04127e-05; grpmax FAF 2.326e-05gnomAD v4.1 AF 1.44198e-05; grpmax FAF 3.005e-05
BP4 review Benign
Computational evidence supports no impact on splicing because the SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.03, which is below the splice-impact threshold of 0.2.
SpliceAI DS_AG 0.01, DS_AL 0.03, DS_DG 0.01, DS_DL 0.00; max delta 0.03
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 16 not assessed
Pathogenic
PVS1 NM_006231.4:c.4006-15C>T is an intronic variant 15 bases upstream of exon 32, and SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.03, which is below the splicing concern threshold of 0.2; no evidence in the case file demonstrates a null effect or predicted exon skipping/cryptic splice creation sufficient for PVS1.
PS1 PS1 requires the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant, and no such matched protein-altering comparison is relevant for this intronic variant in the available record.
PS2 No de novo data with confirmed maternity and paternity are provided.
PS3 No functional assay demonstrating a damaging effect on POLE splicing or function is provided.
PS4 No case-control enrichment, case series, or prevalence comparison supporting increased occurrence in affected individuals is provided.
PM1 No evidence places this intronic position in a defined mutational hot spot or critical functional domain without benign variation.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence data are provided.
PP1 No segregation data are provided.
PP3 Computational evidence does not support a deleterious splicing effect because the SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.03, which is below the commonly used splice-impact threshold of 0.2.
PP4 No phenotype, tumor spectrum, or family history data specific enough to POLE-associated disease are provided.
PP5 Although ClinVar contains a classification, PP5 is not applied here as stand-alone evidence.
Benign
BA1 Benign stand-alone frequency is not met because gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 1.44198e-05 (0.00144%) and gnomAD v2.1 total AF is 2.04127e-05 (0.00204%), both well below the generic BA1 threshold of 1%.
BS1 Benign strong frequency is not met because gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 1.44198e-05 (0.00144%) and gnomAD v2.1 total AF is 2.04127e-05 (0.00204%), both below the generic BS1 threshold of 0.3%.
BS2 No data demonstrate observation in healthy adult individuals at a level sufficient for BS2.
BS3 No functional assay demonstrating a benign effect is provided.
BS4 No nonsegregation data are provided.
BP2 No phase data with another pathogenic variant are provided.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation or case-level data are provided to support BP5.
BP6 ClinVar lists this variant as likely benign with single-submitter review status, but BP6 is not used here as stand-alone evidence.
BP7 The intronic position and low SpliceAI score are compatible with a benign splicing interpretation, but the available record does not provide the additional conservation assessment needed to apply BP7 confidently.
N/A · 6 PM3 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · BP1 · BP3
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.44198e-05; MAF= 0.00144%, 21/1456334 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 6.98519e-05; MAF= 0.00699%, 6/85896 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 3.005e-05.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 2.04127e-05; MAF= 0.00204%, 5/244946 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 8.77552e-05; MAF= 0.00878%, 3/34186 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.326e-05.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0014% · 21 / 1,456,334
0 hom · FAF 0.003%
South Asian
6 / 85,896
0.007%
Admixed American
3 / 44,452
0.0067%
Remaining individuals
2 / 60,188
0.0033%
African/African American
1 / 33,410
0.003%
European (non-Finnish)
9 / 1,110,426
0.00081%
+ 4 not observed (European (Finnish), Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian)
gnomAD v2.1
0.002% · 5 / 244,946
0 hom · FAF 0.0023%
Admixed American
3 / 34,186
0.0088%
South Asian
2 / 30,214
0.0066%
+ 6 not observed (African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (2 clinical laboratories).
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03).
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Somatic evidence
COSMIC
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant cancer hotspot.
Sources & reference links
5Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB