Back
NM_006231.4:c.3332G>A
p.Arg1111Gln · POLE
León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework · vleon-castillo-2020-custom-framework-v1
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2
POLE
c.3332G>A
p.Arg1111Gln

POLE encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, the enzyme that replicates the leading strand of DNA during cell division and participates in DNA repair. It contains a proofreading domain that corrects replication errors, keeping the accumulation of mutations in check. Germline mutations in POLE cause polyposis and predispose to colorectal cancer, and are also linked to a rare syndrome of facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. Somatic mutations, particularly in the proofreading domain, occur in colorectal and endometrial cancers, where they drive an ultra-mutated tumor phenotype and are associated with better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

This variant

POLE's established pathogenic mechanism centers on missense mutations in its proofreading exonuclease domain, where the five recurrent hotspots reside. p.Arg1111Gln maps to exon 27, outside that domain, and is vanishingly rare in population databases. The VUS classification reflects a variant too rare to be dismissed as common but with no evidence tying it to a known POLE disease mechanism.

Transcript
NM_006231.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_006231.4:c.3332G>A
GRCh38
chr12:132657914 C>T
GRCh37
chr12:133234500 C>T
Only PM2 is met (Supporting; highest population AF 0.0109% vs the 0.1% threshold), reaching no Pathogenic or Benign combination, so the variant is classified Uncertain Significance.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
POLE c.3332G>A

PM2 (Supporting): extremely low population frequency — gnomAD total AFs 0.0024-0.0035%, highest subpopulation 0.0109%, zero homozygotes, all below the 0.1% threshold. Overall: Uncertain Significance — a single Supporting criterion (PM2) satisfies no Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, or Benign combination.

PM2 → VUS
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_006231.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
POLE NM_006231.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 24 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
Met (Supporting): all population frequencies are far below the 0.1% threshold (highest subpopulation 0.0109%), with zero homozygotes.
gnomAD v2.1 (exome): 6/251,478 alleles, AF 2.39e-05 (0.0024%), 0 homozygotes, grpmax FAF 7.01e-06 (source_registry key gnomad_v2)gnomAD v4.1 (joint): 57/1,614,138 alleles, AF 3.53e-05 (0.0035%), 0 homozygotes, joint grpmax FAF 3.15e-05; highest subpopulation Finnish AF 1.09e-04 (0.0109%) (source_registry key gnomad_v4)PM2 criterion definition from Richards et al. 2015 ACMG/AMP (PMID 25741868), applied via generic_acmg_combination_rules; project non-VCEP gnomAD PM2 threshold AF <0.1% (max observed 0.0109%, met)
Assessed · not applied · 13 not met · 11 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 Not met: no source establishes p.Arg1111Gln as pathogenic — ClinVar classifies this exact variant as uncertain significance across three laboratories.
PS2 Not assessed: no de novo occurrence or parental-testing data was available for this variant.
PS3 Not assessed: insufficient functional-study evidence was available to evaluate this variant.
PS4 Not met: the variant's somatic recurrence (n=4) falls below the required >=10 in both COSMIC and TCGA endometrial cohorts.
PM1 Not met: residue 1111 lies outside the exonuclease-domain hotspot region occupied by the framework's established pathogenic substitutions.
PM3 Not assessed: no biallelic or trans-phase observation with a pathogenic variant was available.
PM4 Not met: the substitution causes no protein length change (no in-frame indel or stop-loss).
PM5 Not met: no pathogenic missense at residue 1111 with a different amino-acid change has been reported.
PM6 Not assessed: no de novo occurrence (assumed or confirmed) has been reported for this variant.
PP1 Not assessed: no family segregation data was available for this variant.
PP2 Not assessed: no gene-level missense-constraint metric (e.g., gnomAD Z-score) was available to evaluate this gene.
PP3 Not met: REVEL score 0.36 is below the >=0.932 supporting threshold.
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype or family-history data was available.
PP5 Not met: no expert-panel ClinVar classification exists; all three submissions are single-submitter laboratories reporting uncertain significance.
Benign
BA1 Not met: highest allele frequency (0.0109%) is roughly two orders of magnitude below the >1% BA1 threshold.
BS1 Not met: highest allele frequency (0.0109%) is about 30-fold below the >0.3% BS1 threshold.
BS2 Not met: POLE cancer predisposition is adult-onset and incompletely penetrant, so the full-penetrance-at-early-age precondition is unmet.
BS3 Not assessed: insufficient functional-study evidence was available.
BS4 Not assessed: no family non-segregation data was available for this variant.
BP1 Not met: missense is an established POLE disease mechanism (five recurrent exonuclease-domain hotspots), so BP1 cannot apply.
BP2 Not assessed: no cis/trans phase data relative to a pathogenic variant was available.
BP4 Not met: REVEL score 0.36 is above the <=0.016 benign supporting threshold.
BP5 Not assessed: no data on an alternate molecular basis of disease was available.
BP6 Not met: no expert-panel ClinVar classification exists; all three submissions are single-submitter laboratories reporting uncertain significance.
N/A · 3 PVS1 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.5313e-05; MAF= 0.00353%, 57/1614138 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.000109317; MAF= 0.01093%, 7/64034 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 3.15e-05.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 2.38589e-05; MAF= 0.00239%, 6/251478 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 9.23873e-05; MAF= 0.00924%, 2/21648 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.01e-06.
🇨🇦 CA
Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0035% · 57 / 1,614,138
0 hom · FAF 0.0032%
European (Finnish)
7 / 64,034
0.011%
European (non-Finnish)
48 / 1,179,978
0.0041%
African/African American
1 / 75,050
0.0013%
South Asian
1 / 91,082
0.0011%
+ 6 not observed (Remaining individuals, Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0024% · 6 / 251,478
0 hom · FAF 0.0007%
European (Finnish)
2 / 21,648
0.0092%
African/African American
1 / 16,256
0.0062%
European (non-Finnish)
3 / 113,760
0.0026%
+ 5 not observed (Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Remaining individuals, South Asian)
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 405761)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.36. BayesDel score = -0.0290682.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. POLE, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, is an enzyme involved in DNA replication and repair. Select POLE mutations lead to ultra-high m
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV57681369, n = 4 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 1 PMID not cited in assessment
25394175 ↗ A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. CLINVAR