0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

HOXB13 c.251G>A, p.Gly84Glu

NM_006361.6:c.251G>A NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu) Missense · exon 1 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The HOXB13 NM_006361.6:c.251G>A (NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51706067, n = 2 times). Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About HOXB13

HOXB13 encodes a homeobox transcription factor that helps regulate embryonic body patterning, cellular differentiation, proliferation, and prostate cell identity. It is associated with familial and inherited risk of prostate cancer, and its activity can either promote or suppress tumor growth depending on the cellular context. HOXB13 is also involved in several other cancers, where it may be overactive or reduced, including prostate, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancers.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PP1Supporting
PP1 · supporting

Met at supporting strength: complete co-segregation was reported in 34 families, with over-transmission to affected sons at P=6.5×10−6.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PP1 at supporting strength is the only applied criterion and does not satisfy any generic ACMG/AMP pathogenic or benign combination threshold.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
2,798 / 1,613,966 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 2,798 / 1,613,966 alleles. Recorded AF 0.00173362. Recorded homozygote count 5.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00188006; MAF= 0.18801%, 528/280842 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.00761806; MAF= 0.76181%, 191/25072 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.00217612.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0011952624144300772, 22/18406 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.448 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.448. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
32 reported laboratory submissions

16 Pathogenic · 12 Likely pathogenic · 1 Uncertain significance · 1 Likely Pathogenic · 1 pathogenic · 1 association. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
2 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51706067, n = 2 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 1 met · 9 not met · 13 not assessed · 5 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Segregation evidence supports PP1 at supporting strength; PS2 and PM6 lack proband-level de novo documentation, and BS4 lacks documented affected non-carriers.

Generic ACMG/AMP rules govern because no HOXB13 VCEP or gene-specific criteria specification is present.

PS4 is not met from the verified evidence available here.

PP4 and BP5 are not assessed because the case lacks the phenotype/family-history specificity and alternate-molecular-basis information required by their definitions.

PP5 and BP6 are not met because the exact-variant ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions.

Population evidence does not support BA1, BS1, or PM2. BS2 cannot be applied because aggregate gnomAD homozygote counts do not document healthy-adult status and the associated HOXB13 prostate-cancer phenotype is late-onset and incompletely penetrant.

Met · 1

PP1 SupportingACMG_2015Met at supporting strength: complete co-segregation was reported in 34 families, with over-transmission to affected sons at P=6.5×10−6. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The HOXB13 c.251G>A (p.G84E) variant was studied in 112 European-descent prostate-cancer families. The report describes complete co-segregation in 34 families, mixed co-segregation overall, and significant over-transmission to affected sons (P=6.5×10−6). These findings support co-segregation with prostate cancer in multiple affected family members, although incomplete penetrance and genetic heterogeneity warrant human review of the strength.

Rule
PP1: Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data.
Evidence considered
  • Xu et al. studied HOXB13 G84E in 283 subjects from 112 European-descent prostate-cancer families, including 194 men with prostate cancer.
  • The study reported mixed co-segregation, including complete co-segregation in 34 families, and significant over-transmission to affected sons (P=6.5×10−6).
  • The study also reported incomplete penetrance and genetic heterogeneity, so the evidence supports PP1 but does not justify an unqualified stronger strength from the available extracted data.
Sources

Not met · 9 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS4 ACMGNot met: verified exact-variant studies reported ORs of 3.248-4.51, each below the generic PS4 threshold of OR >5.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ACMG/AMP PS4 threshold is OR >5.0 with a 95% confidence interval that excludes 1.0. The selectively read, source-registry-backed exact-variant studies report OR 4.42 (95% CI 2.56-7.64; PMID:23064873), OR 4.51 (95% CI 3.28-6.20; PMID:24026887), OR 3.4-3.5 (PMID:22841674), and OR 3.248 (95% CI 2.313-4.560; PMID:26517352). The required comparisons are 4.42 > 5.0? no, 4.51 > 5.0? no, 3.4 > 5.0? no, and 3.248 > 5.0? no. Although the literature_pass classifier listed an additional familial case-control lead with a reported OR of 7.9, that PMID has no source_registry entry or paper_extracts finding in this case, so it is not used as auditable evidence. PS4 is not met from the verified evidence available here.

Rule
Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
  • Xu et al. (PMID:23064873), Results/Table 1: 283 carriers from 112 European-descent prostate-cancer families, including 194 affected men; affected versus unknown-status men 51% versus 31%, estimated OR 4.42 (95% CI 2.56-7.64).
  • Lin et al. (PMID:24026887), abstract and Results: pooled OR 4.51 (95% CI 3.28-6.20) for prostate cancer across 11 studies.
  • Karlsson et al. (PMID:22841674), Results/Table 2: 4.6% of CAPS cases versus 1.4% of controls, OR 3.4 (95% CI 2.2-5.4), and 4.3% of Stockholm-1 cases versus 1.3% of controls, OR 3.5 (95% CI 2.4-5.2).
  • Liu et al. (PMID:26517352), Results/Table 2: pooled prostate-cancer OR 3.248 (95% CI 2.313-4.560).
Sources
PM2 ACMGNot met: the variant occurs at 0.186% in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 0.147% in v3.1 non-cancer genomes, so it is not absent from controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is not met. The variant is observed in the relevant control population datasets: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes AF 0.0018616 (438/235282 alleles), gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes AF 0.00146721 (217/147900), and gnomAD v4.1 all-comers AF 0.00173362 (2798/1613966), with homozygotes reported in each dataset. These frequencies are not absent or extremely low for this dominant cancer-susceptibility context.

Rule
PM2: Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium. ... PM2 (supporting): <= 0.0001 — SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to Supporting (ClinGen SVI 2020) (PMID:25741868)
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: AF 0.0018616, 438/235282 alleles, 2 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: AF 0.00146721, 217/147900 alleles, 1 homozygote.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: AF 0.00173362, 2798/1613966 alleles, 5 homozygotes.
  • The supplied PM2 supporting threshold is <=0.0001; each reported population frequency is above that threshold.
Sources
PP3 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.448 is below the PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 and lies in the gray zone. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu), so the applicable generic computational path is REVEL only; SpliceAI, BayesDel, and other predictors are not counted. REVEL is 0.448, which is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >= 0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 is not met. The score is also in the gray zone and cannot be replaced by the available SpliceAI score.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... PP3 (supporting): >= 0.644 — ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, Am J Hum Genet) (PMID:36413997)
Evidence considered
  • The variant is missense (NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)); therefore REVEL is the sole applicable computational path.
  • Local REVEL lookup: score 0.448. This is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 is not met.
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, but it is not used for PP3/BP4 because this is a missense variant; BayesDel score 0.187019 is not usable because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
PP5 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar shows zero expert-panel submissions for the exact variant, so laboratory and aggregate pathogenic labels cannot trigger PP5. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing PP5 rule concerns a reputable source reporting the variant as pathogenic when the evidence is unavailable for independent evaluation. Under the specified generic rule, PP5 may be applied only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification. ClinVar variation 128031 has no expert-panel submissions; it has laboratory submissions and an aggregate Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic record. Therefore PP5 is not met and those non-expert classifications are not used to trigger it.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 128031, exact NM_006361.6:c.251G>A (p.Gly84Glu): expert_panels is empty; the record contains laboratory submissions and an aggregate Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic classification, not an expert-panel classification.
Sources
BA1 ACMGNot met: the highest ancestry-specific frequency is 0.769%, far below the generic BA1 threshold of 5%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes at AF 0.0018616 (438/235282 alleles), gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes at AF 0.00146721 (217/147900), and gnomAD v4.1 all-comers at AF 0.00173362 (2798/1613966). The highest reported ancestry-specific frequency is 0.00769038 in Finnish individuals in gnomAD v4.1, well below the generic stand-alone threshold of 0.05 (5%).

Rule
BA1: Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium. ... BA1 (stand-alone): >= 0.05 — ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele frequency (PMID:25741868)
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: AF 0.0018616, 438/235282 alleles, 2 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: AF 0.00146721, 217/147900 alleles, 1 homozygote.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: AF 0.00173362, 2798/1613966 alleles, 5 homozygotes; highest ancestry-specific frequency was Finnish AF 0.00769038 (491/63846 alleles).
  • The observed maximum of 0.00769038 is below the supplied generic BA1 threshold of 0.05.
Sources
BS1 ACMGNot met: the maximum Finnish frequency is 0.769%, below the generic 1% BS1 default, with founder and reduced-penetrance context against applying that default alone. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met on the available population data. The highest observed ancestry-specific frequency is 0.00769038 (0.769%) in Finnish individuals; the gnomAD v4.1 all-comers group maximum is 0.00178665 and the gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer group maximum is 0.00171266, all below the supplied generic 0.01 default. The variant is a known Finnish founder allele associated with prostate-cancer susceptibility, and the available study estimated cumulative carrier prostate-cancer risk to age 80 at 33%, indicating reduced, late-onset penetrance; therefore the default 1% threshold does not independently support BS1.

Rule
BS1: Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder. ... BS1 (strong): >= 0.01 — Generic SVI default; per-gene derivation preferred (Whiffin et al. 2017) (PMID:28518168)
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: Finnish AF 0.00769038 (491/63846 alleles), overall group maximum FAF 0.00178665.
  • gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: Finnish AF 0.00640181 (68/10622 alleles), group maximum FAF 0.00171266.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: Finnish AF 0.00762292 (191/25056 alleles), group maximum FAF 0.0022023.
  • Karlsson et al. population-based Swedish cohorts reported the G84E allele on a single haplotype consistent with a founder mutation and estimated cumulative prostate-cancer risk to age 80 at 33% for carriers versus 12% for noncarriers.
  • The supplied generic BS1 default is 0.01; all observed frequencies are below that value, and no disease-specific maximum-credible-frequency calculation was supplied.
Sources
BP1 ACMG_2015Not met: HOXB13 disease evidence prominently documents the missense p.Gly84Glu mechanism, not a disease mechanism primarily caused by truncating variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 applies when a gene's disease mechanism is primarily truncating variation. The available HOXB13 evidence instead documents a recurrent missense disease allele, p.Gly84Glu, with increased prostate-cancer risk in population-based and familial studies (odds ratios 3.4–3.5 and 4.42). This does not support a primarily truncating disease mechanism for this missense interpretation.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Evidence considered
  • G84E was associated with prostate cancer with odds ratios of 3.4 and 3.5 in two Swedish case-control cohorts (PMID:22841674, Results, paragraph 2; Table 2).
  • G84E was observed in 283 subjects from 112 prostate-cancer families, with an estimated odds ratio of 4.42 (PMID:23064873, Results, paragraph 2; Table 1).
  • These variant-level findings demonstrate an established missense disease mechanism and do not support the BP1 premise that disease is primarily caused by truncating variants.
Sources
BP4 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.448 exceeds the BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 and lies in the gray zone. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu), so the applicable generic computational path is REVEL only; SpliceAI, BayesDel, and other predictors are not counted. REVEL is 0.448, which is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <= 0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met. The gray-zone REVEL result does not permit substituting the low SpliceAI score as BP4 evidence.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... BP4 (supporting): <= 0.29 — ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, Am J Hum Genet) (PMID:36413997)
Evidence considered
  • The variant is missense (NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)); therefore REVEL is the sole applicable computational path.
  • Local REVEL lookup: score 0.448. This is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met.
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, but it is not used for PP3/BP4 because this is a missense variant; BayesDel score 0.187019 is not usable because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP6 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely-benign classification, so BP6 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing BP6 rule concerns a reputable source reporting the variant as benign when the evidence is unavailable for independent evaluation. Under the specified generic rule, BP6 may be applied only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification. ClinVar variation 128031 has no expert-panel submissions and does not provide an expert-panel benign or likely-benign classification. Therefore BP6 is not met.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 128031, exact NM_006361.6:c.251G>A (p.Gly84Glu): expert_panels is empty, and the submission summary contains no benign or likely-benign expert-panel classification.
Sources

Not assessed · 13 · no assessment recorded

PS1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no qualifying pathogenic HOXB13 variant with a different nucleotide change producing the same p.Gly84Glu substitution was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu (NM_006361.6:c.251G>A). The available evidence documents this exact missense change but does not identify a previously established pathogenic HOXB13 variant caused by a different nucleotide change that produces the same Gly84Glu amino-acid substitution. Therefore the same-amino-acid requirement cannot be verified.

Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Evidence considered
  • The evaluated variant is NM_006361.6:c.251G>A, NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu); no qualifying alternate-nucleotide same-amino-acid comparator was available.
Still missing
  • A validated alternate-nucleotide variant producing p.Gly84Glu, with established pathogenic evidence, is needed.
PS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected proband with confirmed maternity and paternity is documented as carrying a de novo variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-level observation documents this variant as de novo in an affected proband. The available evidence does not provide confirmed maternity and paternity, and it does not establish absence of a family history.

Rule
PS2: De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • The reviewed case evidence contains no documented trio testing or confirmed maternity and paternity for an affected proband.
Still missing
  • Affected proband-level de novo observation
  • Confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Documented absence of family history
PS3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no variant-specific functional assay was identified; reviewed studies were genetic association analyses, and the only functional paper tested wild-type HOXB13 overexpression. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No variant-specific in vitro or in vivo functional study was identified for HOXB13 c.251G>A (p.Gly84Glu). The reviewed literature consists of genetic association and segregation studies, including family genotyping and epidemiologic meta-analyses, not assays measuring the variant's effect on HOXB13 function. PMID:15964834 provides functional data for wild-type HOXB13 overexpression in rat epidermal keratinocytes but does not mention or test p.Gly84Glu, so it cannot establish a damaging effect for this variant. OncoKB labels the variant's biological effect as loss-of-function, but that curated annotation is not itself a validated functional assay and is insufficient to apply PS3.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:15964834: HOXB13 overexpression in rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic cultures altered proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, transglutaminase activity, and morphology, but the paper did not report or test c.251G>A/p.Gly84Glu.
  • PMID:23064873: HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu was evaluated by genotyping in 2,443 hereditary prostate cancer families; the study reported association, transmission, and segregation findings rather than a functional assay.
  • PMID:24026887: meta-analysis of 11 observational studies involving 120,167 participants reported a pooled prostate-cancer relative risk of 4.51 for G84E carriers and stated that the mechanism was unknown; no functional assay was performed.
  • PMID:22841674: two Swedish population-based case-control cohorts reported G84E association with prostate cancer (relative risks 3.4 and 3.5); the study used genotyping and epidemiologic analyses, not a functional assay.
  • PMID:26517352: pooled analysis of 25 case-control epidemiological studies reported prostate-cancer OR 3.248 (95% CI 2.313–4.560; P < 0.001); no variant-specific functional assay was described.
  • OncoKB: variant-specific curated annotation lists biological effect context as loss-of-function, but no validated assay result or assay controls are supplied in the reviewed evidence.
Still missing
  • A validated, reproducible in vitro or in vivo assay directly comparing HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu with wild type is needed.
  • Assay controls, biological relevance, and quantitative variant effect data are not available for this variant.
Sources
PM1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: p.Gly84Glu lies in the first MEIS-interacting domain, but critical-domain status and absence of benign variation are not established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

HOXB13 has no governing VCEP specification or authoritative domain table in this case. A meta-analysis states that G84E lies within the first MEIS-interacting domain, but the available evidence does not establish that region as a qualifying critical and well-established functional domain without benign variation; the hotspot source reports no statistically significant hotspot. The generic PM1 threshold therefore cannot be confirmed.

Rule
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Evidence considered
  • G84E is reported in the first MEIS-interacting domain of HOXB13 (PMID:24026887, Abstract; Results, Meta-analysis results; Discussion).
  • The hotspot assessment reports that the variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot; no VCEP hotspot route governs this gene.
Still missing
  • A reliable source must establish the first MEIS-interacting domain as critical and well-established for HOXB13 and document absence of benign variation in the relevant region.
Sources
PM5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no different pathogenic missense substitution at HOXB13 residue 84 was identified for comparison with p.Gly84Glu. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The evaluated variant is p.Gly84Glu. No different missense substitution at HOXB13 residue 84 with established pathogenic evidence was identified in the available comparator evidence. The exact p.Gly84Glu variant itself cannot serve as the required different missense comparator, so PM5 cannot be assessed as met.

Rule
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.
Evidence considered
  • The PM5 comparator record contains no candidate variants at residue 84; the only established variant in the reviewed evidence is the evaluated p.Gly84Glu change.
Still missing
  • A different missense variant at residue 84 with established pathogenic evidence is needed.
PM6 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected proband is documented with an assumed de novo variant lacking parental confirmation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-level observation documents this variant as assumed de novo in an affected proband. The available evidence does not provide an unconfirmed parental-origin assessment that would support PM6.

Rule
PM6: Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Evidence considered
  • The reviewed case evidence contains no documented proband-level assumed de novo observation or parental-origin assessment.
Still missing
  • Affected proband-level de novo observation
  • Evidence that parental confirmation was unavailable rather than negative
PP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: missense disease association is documented, but no gene-level evidence establishes a low rate of benign HOXB13 missense variation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

HOXB13 missense disease mechanism is supported by recurrent G84E association in prostate-cancer cohorts, including odds ratios of 3.4–3.5 and 4.42. However, the available evidence does not establish that HOXB13 has a low rate of benign missense variation at the gene level. Because both elements of PP2 are required, PP2 is not assessed.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Evidence considered
  • The G84E missense variant was associated with prostate cancer with odds ratios of 3.4 and 3.5 in two Swedish cohorts (PMID:22841674, Results, paragraph 2; Table 2).
  • The variant was identified in 283 subjects from 112 prostate-cancer families and had an estimated odds ratio of 4.42 (PMID:23064873, Results, paragraph 2; Table 1).
  • No qualifying gene-level benign-missense-rate metric was available.
Still missing
  • Gene-level missense constraint or an equivalent validated demonstration of low benign missense variation is needed.
Sources
PP4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the patient's phenotype and family history are not provided, so specificity for a single genetic etiology cannot be judged. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing PP4 rule requires a patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. The case materials identify the HOXB13 variant but do not provide the patient's phenotype, detailed family history, or evidence that the phenotype is highly specific for a single genetic etiology. The criterion therefore cannot be assessed.

Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Still missing
  • Patient phenotype and detailed family history are needed to assess whether the presentation is highly specific for a single genetic etiology.
BS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: five gnomAD homozygotes are reported, but healthy-adult status is undocumented and HOXB13 prostate-cancer susceptibility is late-onset with 33% carrier risk by age 80. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not assessed. gnomAD reports homozygotes (2 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes, 1 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, and 5 in gnomAD v4.1 all-comers), but these records do not document that any homozygous individual was a healthy adult. More importantly, the relevant HOXB13 phenotype is prostate-cancer susceptibility with late onset and incomplete penetrance, rather than a disorder for which full penetrance is expected at an early age. The available population study estimated only 33% cumulative prostate-cancer risk to age 80 for carriers, so a population homozygote count alone cannot satisfy BS2.

Rule
BS2: Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes report 2 homozygotes; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes report 1 homozygote; gnomAD v4.1 all-comers report 5 homozygotes.
  • The gnomAD records provide aggregate counts but do not establish that the homozygotes were healthy adults or provide individual clinical follow-up.
  • Karlsson et al. estimated cumulative prostate-cancer risk to age 80 at 33% for G84E carriers versus 12% for noncarriers, supporting late-onset/incomplete-penetrance context.
Still missing
  • No individual-level phenotype and age-at-assessment data are available for the reported homozygotes.
  • No evidence establishes full early-age penetrance for the relevant HOXB13 disorder.
Sources
BS3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no variant-specific functional study demonstrated preserved HOXB13 protein function or splicing; available studies were genetic association analyses. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No variant-specific in vitro or in vivo functional study was identified that demonstrates no damaging effect of HOXB13 c.251G>A (p.Gly84Glu) on protein function or splicing. The reviewed variant-level studies were genetic association, segregation, or epidemiologic analyses, while PMID:15964834 examined wild-type HOXB13 overexpression and did not test p.Gly84Glu. Therefore, the available evidence cannot establish benign functional evidence for BS3, at any strength.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:15964834: functional experiments assessed wild-type HOXB13 overexpression in rat epidermal keratinocytes, not the p.Gly84Glu variant; the results therefore do not support preserved function for this variant.
  • PMID:23064873: family-based genotyping and segregation analysis of G84E provided clinical association evidence, not evidence that the altered protein has no damaging effect.
  • PMID:24026887: observational meta-analysis explicitly noted that the mechanism by which G84E promotes prostate cancer was unknown and performed no functional assay.
  • PMID:22841674: population-based genotyping and risk analysis did not assess protein function or splicing.
  • PMID:26517352: epidemiologic pooled analysis evaluated cancer susceptibility and did not assess protein function or splicing.
Still missing
  • A validated, reproducible assay directly testing whether HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu preserves protein function or normal splicing is needed.
  • Appropriate positive and negative controls and quantitative functional results are not available for this variant.
Sources
BS4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: mixed co-segregation is reported, but no specific affected non-carriers are documented to establish lack of segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available family study reports mixed co-segregation and genetic heterogeneity but does not identify specific affected family members who lack the variant. Without documented affected non-carriers in a family, lack of segregation cannot be established.

Rule
BS4: Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Evidence considered
  • Xu et al. reported mixed co-segregation, incomplete penetrance, and genetic heterogeneity in 112 prostate-cancer families, but the extracted evidence does not enumerate affected non-carriers in a defined family.
  • The available information therefore cannot distinguish true lack of segregation from incomplete penetrance, phenocopy, or family heterogeneity.
Still missing
  • Family-level genotypes and phenotypes for affected non-carriers
  • Assessment of phenocopies and possible multiple pathogenic variants
Sources
BP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no second pathogenic variant or cis/trans phase is reported for the affected individuals carrying HOXB13 G84E. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP2 requires observation with a pathogenic variant either in trans for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or in cis for any inheritance pattern. The available evidence reports HOXB13 G84E in affected prostate-cancer families and transmission to affected offspring, but does not identify a second pathogenic variant in the same individuals or establish cis/trans phase; the criterion therefore cannot be assessed.

Rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23064873 paper extract: HOXB13 G84E was identified in 283 subjects from 112 European-descent prostate-cancer families, including 194 affected men; the study reports familial transmission and incomplete penetrance but no second pathogenic variant in cis or trans and no relevant phase determination.
Still missing
  • A documented second pathogenic variant in the same individuals and parental or molecular phasing are needed to evaluate BP2.
Sources
BP5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no alternate molecular basis for disease is documented in the available case evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing BP5 rule requires the variant to be found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. The available case evidence does not document an alternate pathogenic molecular cause in the same case, and no BP5-specific quantitative rule is supplied. The criterion is therefore not assessed.

Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Still missing
  • A documented alternate molecular diagnosis in the same affected case is needed to assess BP5.
Not applicable · 5· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_006361.6:c.251G>A in HOXB13 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PVS1 for HOXB13, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 N/ANot applicable: HOXB13 G84E is evaluated in a dominant susceptibility context, not the recessive disorder context required for PM3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM3 is restricted to recessive disorders and requires the assessed variant to be detected in trans with a pathogenic variant, with phase established through parental or offspring testing. The available HOXB13 evidence concerns a dominant prostate-cancer susceptibility phenotype in affected men and familial transmission, not a recessive disorder or a biallelic disease mechanism; therefore PM3 is not applicable.

Rule
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant ... This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23064873 paper extract: the HOXB13 G84E variant was studied in 112 prostate-cancer families, including 194 affected men, with affected-family transmission and incomplete penetrance; the report does not establish a recessive biallelic disorder or trans phase with another pathogenic variant.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_006361.6:c.251G>A in HOXB13 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM4 for HOXB13, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_006361.6:c.251G>A in HOXB13 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP3 for HOXB13, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006361.6:c.251G>A in HOXB13 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for HOXB13, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
HOXB13
Transcript
NM_006361.6
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_006361.6:c.251G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)
GRCh38
chr17:48728343 C>T
GRCh37
chr17:46805705 C>T
Location and type
Exon 1 · missense
ClinVar
128031
COSMIC
COSV51706067

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in HOXB13, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_006361.6. Select a row to find it on the plot.

HOXB13NM_006361.6
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 2,798 / 1,613,966 alleles AF 0.00173 · 5 homozygotes · FAF 0.00179
gnomAD v2.1 528 / 280,842 alleles AF 0.00188 · 2 homozygotes · FAF 0.00218
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0.0017 · 2798 / 1,613,966 alleles · 5 hom · FAF 0.0018
European (Finnish)491 / 63,846 0.00772 hom
European (non-Finnish)2185 / 1,180,006 0.00192 hom
Remaining individuals91 / 62,512 0.00151 hom
African/African American25 / 75,034 0.00033
Admixed American5 / 60,028 8.3e-05
Ashkenazi Jewish1 / 29,604 3.4e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 4 other groups: Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0.0019 · 528 / 280,842 alleles · 2 hom · FAF 0.0022
European (Finnish)191 / 25,072 0.00761 hom
European (non-Finnish)311 / 128,106 0.00241 hom
Remaining individuals15 / 7,182 0.0021
African/African American9 / 24,234 0.00037
Ashkenazi Jewish1 / 10,310 9.7e-05
Admixed American1 / 35,418 2.8e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 2 other groups: East Asian, South Asian.

gnomAD-Canada

AF not recorded · ? / ? alleles

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00173362; MAF= 0.17336%, 2798/1613966 alleles, homozygotes = 5) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.00769038; MAF= 0.76904%, 491/63846 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.00178665.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00188006; MAF= 0.18801%, 528/280842 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.00761806; MAF= 0.76181%, 191/25072 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.00217612.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0011952624144300772, 22/18406 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

Open the gnomAD-Canada detail page →

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -200 bp
0.002
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -3 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -6 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor gainat -2 bp
0.001
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.012
Pangolin splice gain
0.016

Other predictors

REVEL
0.448
BayesDel
0.187

How the predictions were used

PP3 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.448 is below the PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 and lies in the gray zone. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu), so the applicable generic computational path is REVEL only; SpliceAI, BayesDel, and other predictors are not counted. REVEL is 0.448, which is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >= 0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 is not met. The score is also in the gray zone and cannot be replaced by the available SpliceAI score.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... PP3 (supporting): >= 0.644 — ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, Am J Hum Genet) (PMID:36413997)
Evidence considered
  • The variant is missense (NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)); therefore REVEL is the sole applicable computational path.
  • Local REVEL lookup: score 0.448. This is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 is not met.
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, but it is not used for PP3/BP4 because this is a missense variant; BayesDel score 0.187019 is not usable because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP4 ACMGNot met: missense REVEL score 0.448 exceeds the BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 and lies in the gray zone. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu), so the applicable generic computational path is REVEL only; SpliceAI, BayesDel, and other predictors are not counted. REVEL is 0.448, which is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <= 0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met. The gray-zone REVEL result does not permit substituting the low SpliceAI score as BP4 evidence.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... Missense variant -> REVEL only. ... BP4 (supporting): <= 0.29 — ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, Am J Hum Genet) (PMID:36413997)
Evidence considered
  • The variant is missense (NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu)); therefore REVEL is the sole applicable computational path.
  • Local REVEL lookup: score 0.448. This is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so BP4 is not met.
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, but it is not used for PP3/BP4 because this is a missense variant; BayesDel score 0.187019 is not usable because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006361.6:c.251G>A in HOXB13 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006352.2:p.(Gly84Glu). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for HOXB13, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.448. BayesDel score = 0.187019.

7 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • HOXB13 is a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer: results from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG).
    Xu J et al. · 2013 Jan
    The HOXB13 c.251G>A (p.G84E) variant was identified in 283 subjects from 112 European-descent prostate-cancer families, including 194 men with prostate cancer. It was more frequent in affected men, had an estimated odds ratio of 4.42, and was significantly over-transmitted to affected sons.
    → PP1 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 23064873 ↗
    Source detail
    The G84E mutation was found in 283 subjects from 112 families of European descent, including 194 men with prostate cancer.

    Location Results, paragraph 2; Table 1

    Context HOXB13 variant genotyping in 2,443 hereditary prostate-cancer families from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics; MassARRAY iPLEX genotyping, family-based association testing, and haplotype analysis.

Other recorded publications

  • A population-based assessment of germline HOXB13 G84E mutation and prostate cancer risk.
    Karlsson R et al. · 2014
    In two Swedish population-based studies, HOXB13 G84E was present in 1.3%–1.4% of controls and 4.3%–4.6% of prostate-cancer cases, with odds ratios of 3.4 and 3.5; the association was stronger for younger-onset and familial disease.
    Names this variant
    PMID 22841674 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The G84E mutation was associated with a PCa relative risk of 3.4 (95% CI, 2.2–5.4; p = 6.4e−10) in CAPS and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.4–5.2, p = 2.0e−11) in Stockholm-1.

    Results, paragraph 2; Table 2; Results, paragraph 5

  • Germline homeobox B13 (HOXB13) G84E mutation and prostate cancer risk in European descendants: a meta-analysis of 24,213 cases and 73, 631 controls.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23518396 ↗
  • G84E mutation in HOXB13 is firmly associated with prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
    This meta-analysis of 11 studies and 120,167 participants examined HOXB13 G84E. It reported that G84E is located in exon 1 within the first MEIS-interacting domain of HOXB13 and that carriers had a pooled prostate-cancer relative risk of 4.51.
    Names this variant
    PMID 24026887 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Men with the HOXB13 G84E variant had a 4.51-fold higher relative risk of PCa compared with non-carriers (95 % CI 3.28–6.20).

    Abstract; Results, Meta-analysis results; Discussion

  • Germline HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation and cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 25 epidemiological studies with 145,257 participates.
    A pooled analysis of 25 epidemiological studies including 51,390 cases and 93,867 controls reported an association between HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu and prostate cancer, with OR 3.248 (95% CI 2.313–4.560; P < 0.001), but did not assess protein function or splicing.
    Names this variant
    PMID 26517352 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The results presented that HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation contributed to the susceptibility of prostate cancer (OR = 3.248, 95% CI = 2.313–4.560, P < 0.001; Figure 3).

    Results, Quantitative data analyses; Table 2; Discussion, first paragraph

  • Hoxb13 up-regulates transglutaminase activity and drives terminal differentiation in an epidermal organotypic model.
    Mack JA et al. · 2005
    The paper studies wild-type HOXB13 overexpression in rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic cultures. Overexpression reduced proliferation, increased apoptosis, promoted terminal differentiation, increased transglutaminase activity, and produced abnormal epidermal morphology, but the specified HOXB13 c.251G>A (p.Gly84Glu) variant was not reported or tested.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 15964834 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Together, these data support a role for Hoxb13 in suppressing proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and driving epidermal differentiation, and they strengthen the possibility that Hoxb13 is involved in wound repair and in the pathogenesis of certain skin diseases.

    Abstract; Results and Discussion sections describing HOXB13 overexpression in REK lift cultures

  • ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 17060676 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00173362; MAF= 0.17336%, 2798/1613966 alleles, homozygotes = 5) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.00769038; MAF= 0.76904%, 491/63846 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.00178665.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00188006; MAF= 0.18801%, 528/280842 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 0.00761806; MAF= 0.76181%, 191/25072 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.00217612.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0011952624144300772, 22/18406 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (16 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (12 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory) and as Likely Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory) and as pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory) and as association (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 128031)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.448. BayesDel score = 0.187019.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51706067, n = 2 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.