Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
KEAP1
Final classification
VUS
KEAP1 c.340G>A · p.Gly114Arg
KEAP1

PM2 (Supporting): gnomAD v4.1 total allele frequency 0.00006% (1/1,614,156 alleles, 0 homozygotes) is far below the 0.1% threshold.

Gene
KEAP1
Transcript
NM_012289.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_012289.4:c.340G>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr19:10499694 C>T
GRCh37
chr19:10610370 C>T
Basis VUS: only PM2 (supporting) is met, on gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 0.00006% (far below the 0.1% threshold), which alone satisfies no Pathogenic or Benign combination rule.
VUS: only PM2 (supporting) is met, on gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 0.00006% (far below the 0.1% threshold), which alone satisfies no Pathogenic or Benign combination rule.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
KEAP1 c.340G>A

PM2 (Supporting): gnomAD v4.1 total allele frequency 0.00006% (1/1,614,156 alleles, 0 homozygotes) is far below the 0.1% threshold. Synthesis: with PM2 supporting as the only applied criterion, no ACMG/AMP 2015 Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Benign, or Likely Benign combination rule is satisfied, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

PM2 VUS
Gene diagram · NM_012289.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
KEAP1 NM_012289.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 22 assessed
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
Met (supporting): gnomAD v4.1 total allele frequency 0.00006% is far below the 0.1% threshold, with zero homozygotes.
gnomad_v4gnomad_v2gnomad_canada
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 Not assessed: no established pathogenic variant producing the same amino-acid change (p.Gly114Arg) was available to compare against.
PS2 Not assessed: no proband genotype, parental-testing results, or family-history data were available to evaluate a confirmed de novo occurrence.
PS3 Not assessed: no functional studies of this variant were available; in-silico scores (REVEL 0.6, BayesDel 0.171) are not functional evidence.
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control or cohort enrichment data exist for this variant, which is unreported in ClinVar and COSMIC.
PM1 Not met: the variant is not in a statistically significant hotspot (Cancer Hotspots no-result), and no critical-domain rule applies to Gly114.
PM5 Not assessed: no alternate pathogenic missense at residue Gly114 was available to establish that a different change at this residue is pathogenic.
PM6 Not assessed: no proband or parental trio data were available, so an assumed de novo occurrence cannot be evaluated.
PP1 Not assessed: no pedigree, family-member genotypes, or segregation analysis were available for this variant.
PP2 Not assessed: gene-level missense constraint metrics (e.g., gnomAD missense Z-score) were unavailable, even though missense is a known KEAP1 disease mechanism.
PP3 Not met: REVEL 0.600 is below the 0.644 supporting threshold, and SpliceAI 0.01 predicts no splice impact, so multiple deleterious lines are lacking.
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype or family history was available, and no publication reports this exact variant.
PP5 Not met: ClinVar has no record of this variant, so no 3-star expert-panel pathogenic classification exists to apply.
Benign
BA1 Not met: the highest observed allele frequency (0.00008%) is about four orders of magnitude below the 1% threshold.
BS1 Not met: the highest allele frequency (0.00008%) is roughly four orders of magnitude below the 0.3% threshold for the disorder.
BS2 Not met: only a single heterozygous exome carrier exists in gnomAD v4.1, far below any frequency supporting observation in healthy adults.
BS3 Not assessed: no functional studies demonstrating absence of a damaging effect on the protein were available for this variant.
BS4 Not assessed: no affected family members were tested or reported, so non-segregation of the variant cannot be evaluated.
BP1 Not met: pathogenic missense variants are established in KEAP1 germline disease, so a missense change cannot be discounted as benign by mechanism.
BP2 Not met: no trans or cis observation of this variant with a pathogenic variant has been reported.
BP4 Not met: only SpliceAI (delta 0.01) suggests no impact; REVEL 0.600 and BayesDel 0.171 do not, so multiple benign lines are lacking.
BP5 Not assessed: no proband case data or information about an alternate molecular basis for disease were available.
BP6 Not met: ClinVar has no record of this variant, so no 3-star expert-panel benign classification exists to apply.
N/A · 5 PVS1 · PM3 · PM4 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19519e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1614156 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47427e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1180042 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
6.2e-05% · 1 / 1,614,156
0 hom
European (non-Finnish)
1 / 1,180,042
8.5e-05%
+ 9 not observed (Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.6. BayesDel score = 0.171058.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. KEAP1, a tumor suppressor and adaptor protein, is recurrently mutated in lung cancer.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots