Back
NM_020821.3:c.5566G>T
p.Gly1856Trp · VPS13C
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2BP4
VPS13C
c.5566G>T
p.Gly1856Trp
This variant

The VPS13C c.5566G>T (p.Gly1856Trp; p.G1856W) variant has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_020821.3
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_020821.3:c.5566G>T
GRCh38
chr15:61940682 C>A
GRCh37
chr15:62232881 C>A
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS because the evidence is conflicting.
Classification rationale
PM2 BP4 VUS
VPS13C c.5566G>T

The VPS13C c.5566G>T (p.Gly1856Trp; p.G1856W) variant has not been reported in ClinVar.1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, placing it below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2.2 Computational evidence does not support a damaging or splice-altering effect: SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a max delta score of 0.11, REVEL is 0.261, and BayesDel is -0.307905.3

PM2 + BP4 VUS
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_020821.3 · variants mapped to exon structure
VPS13C NM_020821.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 22 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate review Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which places the allele frequency below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1%, supporting rarity in population databases.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1Absent from gnomAD v4.1
BP4 supporting review Benign
Multiple computational results argue against a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a max delta score of 0.11, which is below 0.2, REVEL is 0.261, and BayesDel is -0.307905, together supporting BP4.
SpliceAI max delta score 0.11REVEL score 0.261BayesDel score -0.307905
Assessed · not applied · 3 not met · 19 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified showing that a different nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification, so PS1 was not assessed.
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental testing was identified, so PS2 was not assessed.
PS3 No well-established functional study for this exact variant was identified, so PS3 was not assessed.
PS4 No enrichment data or repeated observations in affected individuals were identified for this variant, so PS4 was not assessed.
PM1 Available hotspot review did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at Gly1856, but the hotspot result was flagged for confirmation, so PM1 was not assessed.
PM3 No observations of this variant in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant were identified, so PM3 was not assessed.
PM5 No different pathogenic missense change at codon 1856 was identified from the available evidence, so PM5 was not assessed.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified, so PM6 was not assessed.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed.
PP2 Available evidence did not establish a gene-specific missense constraint or a predominance of pathogenic missense variation sufficient to apply PP2, so PP2 was not assessed.
PP3 Available computational evidence does not support a damaging effect.
PP4 No phenotype information specific enough to establish a highly specific clinical presentation for this variant was identified, so PP4 was not assessed.
PP5 No reputable source classification for this exact variant was identified, so PP5 was not assessed.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not meet the stand-alone benign frequency threshold of more than 1%.
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not exceed the strong benign frequency threshold of more than 0.3%.
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a count sufficient for BS2, so BS2 was not assessed.
BS3 No well-established functional study showing retained or normal function for this exact variant was identified, so BS3 was not assessed.
BS4 No lack-of-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed.
BP1 Available evidence did not establish that benign interpretation is favored because only truncating variants cause disease in this gene, so BP1 was not assessed.
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant, so BP2 was not assessed.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation for the observed phenotype was provided, so BP5 was not assessed.
BP6 No reputable source benign classification for this exact variant was identified, so BP6 was not assessed.
N/A · 4 PVS1 · PM4 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.11). REVEL score = 0.261. BayesDel score = -0.307905.
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots