Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
FANCD2
Final classification
VUS
FANCD2 c.3560+2T>A · p.?
FANCD2

PM2 (Supporting): variant absent (AF 0) from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada — below the <0.1% recessive-disorder threshold.

Gene
FANCD2
Transcript
NM_033084.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_033084.4:c.3560+2T>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr3:10088544 T>A
GRCh37
chr3:10130228 T>A
Basis Variant of Uncertain Significance: only PM2 (supporting) was met — the variant is absent (AF 0) from gnomAD — and one supporting criterion meets no Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Benign, or Likely Benign threshold.
Variant of Uncertain Significance: only PM2 (supporting) was met — the variant is absent (AF 0) from gnomAD — and one supporting criterion meets no Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Benign, or Likely Benign threshold.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
FANCD2 c.3560+2T>A

PM2 (Supporting): variant absent (AF 0) from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada — below the <0.1% recessive-disorder threshold. Overall classification: VUS — a single supporting criterion meets no Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Benign, or Likely Benign combination threshold under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 framework.

PM2 VUS
Gene diagram · NM_033084.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
FANCD2 NM_033084.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 19 assessed
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
Met (supporting): variant is absent (AF 0) from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, below the <0.1% PM2 threshold.
gnomAD v2.1 (exome): variant absent, AF = 0 (below <0.1% PM2 threshold)gnomAD v4.1 (exome): variant absent, AF = 0 (below <0.1% PM2 threshold)gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes): variant absent, AF = 0
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PVS1 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available to evaluate whether this splice variant causes loss of function.
PS2 Not assessed: no proband or parental-testing data were available to confirm or exclude a de novo origin.
PS3 Not assessed: no functional assay evidence was available; the only relevant datum was an in silico splice prediction, not a functional assay.
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control or cohort data reported this variant — it is absent from ClinVar, gnomAD, and the literature.
PM3 Not assessed: no proband, second-allele, or phase data were available to test for a pathogenic trans counterpart.
PM6 Not assessed: no proband or parental testing data were available to evaluate an assumed de novo occurrence.
PP1 Not assessed: no pedigree or family segregation data were available.
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI max delta 0.99 predicts near-certain splice impact, but this same prediction is counted under PVS1 and cannot be double-counted as PP3.
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype or family history data were available to assess phenotype specificity.
PP5 Not met: ClinVar has no record for this variant, so no expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification exists to support PP5.
Benign
BA1 Not met: variant is absent (AF 0) from population databases, far below the >1% BA1 threshold.
BS1 Not met: variant is absent (AF 0), far below the >0.3% BS1 threshold expected for this very rare recessive disorder.
BS2 Not met: no homozygous observations exist — the variant is absent from all queried population databases, and biallelic loss causes severe early-onset disease.
BS3 Not assessed: no well-established functional study demonstrating a benign effect was available for this variant.
BS4 Not assessed: no family segregation testing was performed, so lack of segregation could not be observed.
BP2 Not assessed: no second variant or phase-resolved observation was available to evaluate a cis/trans configuration.
BP4 Not met: SpliceAI max delta 0.99 predicts near-certain splice impact, the opposite of the no-impact evidence BP4 requires.
BP5 Not assessed: no proband genotype or diagnostic data were available to evaluate an alternative molecular cause.
BP6 Not met: ClinVar has no record for this variant, so no expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification exists to support BP6.
N/A · 8 PS1 · PM1 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · BP1 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.99). BayesDel score = 0.66.
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Somatic evidence
COSMIC
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant cancer hotspot.
COSMIC ↗
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC