Back
NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A
p.Pro324Thr · ESR1
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2PP3
ESR1
c.970C>A
p.Pro324Thr
This variant

NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) is a missense variant in exon 5 of ESR1.

Transcript
NM_001122740.1
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A
GRCh38
chr6:151944382 C>A
GRCh37
chr6:152265517 C>A
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP3 supporting; combination = 2 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2PP3 VUS
ESR1 c.970C>A

NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) is a missense variant in exon 5 of ESR1. This variant is absent from gnomAD population databases (v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.1 Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.844 (damaging) and BayesDel noAF score 0.302 (above the -0.36 damaging threshold), meeting PP3 at supporting strength.2 No ClinVar entries exist for this variant; no functional studies, segregation data, or case-control data are available.3 PVS1 is not applicable: this is a missense variant that does not meet null-variant criteria per PMC6185798.4 With only two supporting pathogenic criteria (PM2, PP3) and no benign criteria met, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868).5

PM2 + PP3 VUS
2 revelbayesdel
5 generic_acmg_combination_rules
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_001122740.1 · variants mapped to exon structure
ESR1 NM_001122740.1
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 21 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases (v2.1 exomes, v4.1 exomes, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 genomes), meeting the PM2 threshold of <0.1% allele frequency.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1 (0 alleles)absent from gnomAD v4.1 (0 alleles)absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (0 alleles).
PP3 supporting Pathogenic
Multiple lines of in silico computational evidence support a deleterious effect. REVEL score of 0.844 falls well above the damaging threshold (>0.5). BayesDel noAF score of 0.302 is above the -0.36 damaging threshold, providing additional in silico support. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00).
REVEL: 0.844 (damaging)BayesDel noAF: 0.302 (damaging per -0.36 threshold)SpliceAI: max delta 0.00 (no predicted splice impact).
Assessed · not applied · 21 not met · 0 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No known pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change (Pro324Thr) via a different nucleotide substitution has been identified in ClinVar or the literature.
PS2 No de novo observation with confirmed paternity and maternity is available for this variant.
PS3 No functional studies directly testing NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) or a systematically characterized range including residue 324 were identified.
PS4 No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected individuals to controls is available for this variant.
PM1 Residue Pro324 is not located in a statistically significant cancer hotspot per cancerhotspots.org.
PM5 No pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid residue (Pro324) was identified for comparison.
PM6 No de novo observation (without confirmation of paternity and maternity) is available for this variant.
PP1 No co-segregation data with disease in multiple affected family members is available for this variant.
PP2 Insufficient data to establish that ESR1 has a low rate of benign missense variation with missense variants as a common disease mechanism.
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history data specific to the disease gene was provided for assessment.
PP5 This variant is absent from ClinVar and no reputable source (including 3-star expert panel) has classified it as pathogenic.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases; allele frequency of 0% does not exceed the BA1 threshold of >1%.
BS1 This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases; allele frequency of 0% does not exceed the BS1 threshold of >0.3%.
BS2 No data on homozygous or hemizygous observations of this variant in healthy adults are available.
BS3 No functional studies demonstrating a neutral or benign effect for NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) were identified.
BS4 No segregation data in affected family members demonstrating lack of co-segregation with disease is available.
BP1 ESR1 is not a gene where only truncating variants cause disease.
BP2 No data on observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic dominant variant are available.
BP4 Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a benign impact.
BP5 No data demonstrating that this variant is consistently absent in individuals with ESR1-related disease are available.
BP6 This variant is absent from ClinVar and no reputable source (including 3-star expert panel) has classified it as benign.
N/A · 2 PVS1 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.844. BayesDel score = 0.301677.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. ESR1 (estrogen receptor alpha) is a transcription factor that is frequently mutated in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancers.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots