0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

TP53 c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu

NM_000546.6:c.665C>T NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu) Missense · exon 6 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The TP53 NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV52909202, n = 5 times). Experimental evidence: P222L is Functional in Kato and noLOF in all three available follow-up assays, matching the VCEP's BS3 Strong rule. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About TP53

TP53 encodes the p53 tumor suppressor protein, a transcription factor that responds to cellular stress such as DNA damage by switching on genes that trigger cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, senescence, or programmed cell death. In healthy cells, p53 is kept at low levels by constant degradation, but stress signals stabilize and activate it to protect against damaged cells surviving and dividing. Inherited mutations in TP53 cause Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a condition marked by a high risk of developing multiple cancers at a young age. TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene across human cancers, and loss of its normal function promotes tumor growth, spread, drug resistance, and genomic instability.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting: gnomAD v4.1 total AF was 1.17722e-05, below the VCEP 0.00003 PM2 threshold, with South Asian AF 2.19568e-05 below 0.00004.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BS3Strong
BS3 · strong

Met, Strong: P222L is Functional in Kato and noLOF in all three available follow-up assays, matching the VCEP's BS3 Strong rule.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: BS3 Strong (-4) plus PM2 Supporting (+1) totals -3 points, which is not covered by a listed TP53 VCEP point-based classification range.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
19 / 1,613,970 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 19 / 1,613,970 alleles. Recorded AF 1.17722e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 2.12229e-05; MAF= 0.00212%, 6/282714 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000138427; MAF= 0.01384%, 1/7224 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.242e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.585 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.585. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
16 reported laboratory submissions

10 Uncertain significance · 4 Likely benign · 1 Benign · 1 Uncertain Significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, conflicting classifications.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
5 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV52909202, n = 5 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 6 not met · 8 not assessed · 12 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No qualifying de novo, parental, segregation, or non-segregation evidence was available for PS2, PM6, PP1, or BS4; PM6 is explicitly not applicable under the TP53 VCEP v2.4 specification.

The governing TP53 VCEP functional worksheet contains an exact P222L row and pre-assigns BS3; it does not support PS3.

The exact variant was also reported in a yeast functional study (PMID:17724467), where activity nearly reached wild-type at 35 °C.

PS4 and PP4 remain not_assessed because their VCEP-required phenotype/point and VAF inputs are unavailable.

PP5, BP5, and BP6 are not_applicable because the TP53 VCEP CSPEC explicitly marks each criterion Not Applicable.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingVCEPMet at supporting: gnomAD v4.1 total AF was 1.17722e-05, below the VCEP 0.00003 PM2 threshold, with South Asian AF 2.19568e-05 below 0.00004. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP specifies PM2 at supporting strength when total allele frequency is below 0.00003 and, when multiple alleles occur in an ancestry group, that group's frequency is below 0.00004; founder-effect groups are ignored. Using the default all-comers gnomAD v4.1 dataset, total AF is 1.17722e-05 (19/1613970; homozygotes = 0). The largest eligible ancestry-group AF with multiple alleles is South Asian at 2.19568e-05 (2/91088), below 0.00004; European non-Finnish has 17 alleles at AF 1.44070e-05. PM2_Supporting is met.

VCEP rule
This rule should be applied at supporting level. Variant should have an allele frequency of less than 0.00003 (0.003%) in gnomAD or another large sequenced population. If multiple alleles are present within any genetic ancestry group, allele frequency in that group must be <0.00004 (0.004%). Genetic ancestry groups influenced by founder effects (such as Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, Amish, Middle Eastern, and “Remaining”) should be ignored.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP PM2 rule: apply at supporting level when allele frequency is <0.00003; if multiple alleles occur in an ancestry group, that group's frequency must be <0.00004; founder-effect groups including Remaining are ignored.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: total AF 1.1772213857754481e-05 (19/1613970 alleles), total homozygotes = 0.
  • gnomAD v4.1 South Asian: 2/91088 alleles, AF 2.1956789039170913e-05, homozygotes = 0; European non-Finnish: 17/1179980 alleles, AF 1.4407023847861829e-05, homozygotes = 0.
  • The VCEP rule does not require a non-cancer or exome-only source, so the default all-comers gnomAD v4.1 totals were used.
Sources
BS3 StrongVCEPMet, Strong: P222L is Functional in Kato and noLOF in all three available follow-up assays, matching the VCEP's BS3 Strong rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet.xlsx Supplementary Table S3 row for P222L reports Kato class Functional and noLOF for Funk, Giacomelli, and Kotler, with Kawaguchi NA, and assigns the preliminary functional code BS3. This matches the VCEP BS3 Strong rule requiring functional Kato data and no LOF by the majority of available eligible assays: all three available follow-up assays are noLOF, while Kawaguchi is not available. The VCEP flowchart independently maps a missense variant with Functional Kato data and noLOF by the majority of available assays to BS3.

VCEP rule
Functional on Kato et al. data **AND** no loss of function (LOF) by the majority of available eligible assays
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet.xlsx, Supplementary Table S3, row P222L: Kato class Functional; Funk noLOF; Giacomelli noLOF; Kotler noLOF; Kawaguchi NA; preliminary functional code BS3.
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP functional flowchart: Missense variants with Kato data available and Functional Kato results plus noLOF by the majority of available assays receive BS3.
  • Grochova et al. (PMID:17724467) directly studied P222L in yeast and reported activity nearly reaching wild-type at 35 °C; the study's assay context is concordant with the VCEP worksheet's no-LOF classification.
Sources

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS3 VCEPNot met: the governing worksheet classifies P222L as Kato Functional with noLOF in Funk, Giacomelli, and Kotler, not as a loss-of-function result. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a TP53 missense change, and the governing ClinGen TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet.xlsx Supplementary Table S3 row for P222L reports Kato class Functional, Funk noLOF, Giacomelli noLOF, Kotler noLOF, and Kawaguchi NA, with the pre-assigned functional code BS3. This does not satisfy any PS3 path: PS3 Strong requires non-functional Kato data plus LOF by the majority of other eligible assays; PS3 Moderate requires partially functional Kato data plus majority LOF; and PS3 Supporting requires non-functional Kato data plus abnormal Kawaguchi data. The exact-variant functional assay row therefore supports benign functional evidence rather than loss of function.

VCEP rule
Non-functional on Kato et al. data **AND** loss of function (LOF) by the majority of other eligible assays...Partially functional on Kato et al. data **AND** loss of function (LOF) by the majority of other available assays...Non-functional on Kato et al. data **AND** abnormal on Kawaguchi et al. data regardless of other assays
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet.xlsx, Supplementary Table S3, row P222L: Kato class Functional; Funk noLOF; Giacomelli noLOF; Kotler noLOF; Kawaguchi NA; preliminary functional code BS3.
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP functional flowchart: for missense variants with Kato data, PS3 requires non-functional or partially functional Kato results together with LOF in the specified eligible-assay pattern; the P222L row instead reports Functional Kato data and noLOF in the available follow-up assays.
  • Grochova et al. (PMID:17724467) directly studied P222L in yeast and reported activity nearly reaching wild-type at 35 °C, providing variant-specific functional context consistent with the VCEP worksheet's non-LOF classification.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot met: Pro222 is outside the six VCEP PM1 codons, and cancerhotspots.org reports no qualifying hotspot occurrence for P222L. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP specifies PM1 for missense variants at codons 175, 245, 248, 249, 273, or 282, or for germline missense variants seen in cancerhotspots.org with at least 10 somatic occurrences for the same amino-acid change; the supporting route requires 2–9 cancerhotspots.org somatic occurrences. The variant is p.Pro222Leu, outside all six specified codons, and the cancerhotspots.org result reports no hotspot row. COSMIC reports five occurrences, but COSMIC is not the VCEP-named hotspot source and therefore cannot satisfy the PM1 hotspot route. vcep_materials.json contains no TP53 domain-table entry, so no additional authoritative domain route applies.

VCEP rule
Missense variants within the following codons using transcript NM\_00546.4: 175, 245, 248, 249, 273, 282. This code weight can also be used for germline missense variants seen in cancerhotspots.org with ≥ 10 somatic occurrences for the same amino acid change. ... Missense variants seen in cancerhotspots.org with 2-9 somatic occurrences for the same amino acid change.
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PM1 moderate rule: eligible codons are 175, 245, 248, 249, 273, and 282; the alternative requires at least 10 cancerhotspots.org somatic occurrences for the same amino-acid change.
  • TP53 VCEP PM1 supporting rule: cancerhotspots.org must show 2–9 somatic occurrences for the same amino-acid change.
  • The assessed variant is p.Pro222Leu (residue 222), not one of the six specified codons.
  • Cancer Hotspots result for TP53 P222: no result and no hotspot row found.
  • COSMIC reports COSV52909202 with n = 5 somatic occurrences, but the TP53 VCEP names cancerhotspots.org, not COSMIC, for the hotspot route.
  • vcep_materials.json domain_tables is empty for TP53; therefore no authoritative TP53 domain-table entry adds a PM1 route.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot met: the VCEP table assigns c.665C>T "No evidence" with BayesDel class C0, despite a score of 0.224549, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.045. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/P222L). The governing TP53 PP3-BP4 spreadsheet contains the exact row c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu: BayesDel class C0, BayesDel score 0.224549, assigned code "No evidence," and splice value 0.05. The VCEP missense PP3 paths require either aGVGD C65 with BayesDel >= 0.16 for moderate strength or aGVGD C25-C55 with BayesDel >= 0.16 for supporting strength; the row is C0 and is explicitly pre-assigned "No evidence." SpliceAI is available with maximum delta score 0.045, below the VCEP splice-effect threshold of 0.2, so the splice path is not met either. The flowchart and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel spreadsheet were searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L and had no matching entry; the deletion spreadsheet is outside this missense variant's scope.

VCEP rule
**Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants)_ aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel score ≥ 0.16 ... **Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants)_ aGVGD class C25-C55 and BayesDel score ≥ 0.16 **Exonic (including silent variants and apparent “missense” variants or “single amino acid inframe deletions” for which there is a predicted splice effect) or Intronic Splice Variants (excluding ± 1,2 positions):** SpliceAI ≥ 0.2
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4-codes.xlsx, Supplementary Table S2 row: c.665C>T | p.Pro222Leu | Class C0 | BayesDel 0.224549 | No evidence | 0.05.
  • The exact variant was searched as c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L in the governing PP3/BP4 lookup, flowchart text, and single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel text.
  • SpliceAI Lookup for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T: DS_AG 0.0, DS_AL 0.012, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.045; maximum delta score 0.045.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt; the flowchart is a rule document rather than a variant lookup table.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt; that file covers single amino acid in-frame deletions, not this missense variant.
Sources
BA1 VCEPNot met: highest eligible gnomAD v4.1 ancestry frequency was South Asian AF 2.19568e-05, below the 0.001 BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP requires a filtering allele frequency (FAF) of at least 0.001 in one eligible continental ancestry group, with at least 2,000 alleles tested and at least 2 variant alleles. In gnomAD v4.1, the highest eligible ancestry-group frequency is South Asian AF 2.19568e-05 (2/91088; grpmax FAF 8.78e-06), far below 0.001. Founder-effect and Remaining groups are excluded by the VCEP rule. Therefore BA1 is not met.

VCEP rule
Filtering allele frequency (FAF) of ≥ 0.001 or 0.1% in gnomAD continental subpopulations of a single genetic ancestry group (excluding genetic ancestry groups influenced by founder effects, such as Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, Amish, Middle Eastern, and “Remaining”). Genetic ancestry group must have ≥2,000 alleles tested and a minimum of 2 alleles present.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP BA1 rule: eligible ancestry-group FAF must be ≥0.001, with ≥2,000 alleles tested and at least 2 variant alleles; founder-effect groups and Remaining are excluded.
  • gnomAD v4.1: South Asian was the highest eligible ancestry group at AF 2.19568e-05 (2/91088 alleles), with grpmax FAF 8.78e-06; homozygotes = 0.
  • gnomAD v4.1 source_data: total AF 1.1772213857754481e-05 (19/1613970 alleles); no eligible ancestry group approached FAF 0.001.
Sources
BS1 VCEPNot met: highest eligible gnomAD v4.1 ancestry-group FAF was 8.78e-06, below the 0.0003 BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP requires eligible ancestry-group FAF of at least 0.0003 but less than 0.001, with at least 2,000 alleles tested and at least 2 variant alleles. The highest eligible gnomAD v4.1 ancestry-group frequency is South Asian AF 2.19568e-05 with grpmax FAF 8.78e-06, below 0.0003. The excluded Remaining group is not used. Therefore BS1 is not met.

VCEP rule
Filtering allele frequency (FAF) of ≥ 0.0003 but < 0.001 in gnomAD continental subpopulations of a single genetic ancestry group (excluding genetic ancestry groups influenced by founder effects, such as Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, Amish, Middle Eastern, and “Remaining”). Genetic ancestry group must have ≥2,000 alleles tested and a minimum of 2 alleles present.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP BS1 rule: eligible ancestry-group FAF must be ≥0.0003 and <0.001, with ≥2,000 alleles tested and at least 2 variant alleles; founder-effect groups and Remaining are excluded.
  • gnomAD v4.1: South Asian was the highest eligible ancestry group at AF 2.19568e-05 (2/91088 alleles), while grpmax FAF was 8.78e-06; homozygotes = 0.
  • gnomAD v4.1 source_data: total AF 1.1772213857754481e-05 (19/1613970 alleles).
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: BayesDel 0.224549 exceeds the VCEP BP4 supporting cutoff of <0.16, although SpliceAI max delta 0.045 is below 0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/P222L). The governing TP53 PP3-BP4 spreadsheet contains the exact row c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu with BayesDel class C0, BayesDel score 0.224549, assigned code "No evidence," and splice value 0.05. The VCEP missense BP4 supporting path requires BayesDel < 0.16 and > -0.008, except that C65 cannot receive BP4, together with SpliceAI < 0.2; the observed BayesDel score is 0.224549 and therefore fails the required BayesDel interval. BP4 moderate also requires BayesDel <= -0.008 and is not met. The exact lookup row's pre-assigned "No evidence" governs. The flowchart and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel spreadsheet were searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L and had no matching entry; the deletion spreadsheet is outside this missense variant's scope.

VCEP rule
**Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants):_ BayesDel ≤ -0.008 irrespective of aGVGD score (except C65, in this case do not apply BP4_Moderate) AND no predicted differences in splicing (SpliceAI < 0.2) **Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants):_ BayesDel < 0.16 and > -0.008 irrespective of aGVGD score (except C65, this case do not apply BP4) AND no predicted differences in splicing (SpliceAI < 0.2)
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4-codes.xlsx, Supplementary Table S2 row: c.665C>T | p.Pro222Leu | Class C0 | BayesDel 0.224549 | No evidence | 0.05.
  • SpliceAI Lookup for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T: maximum delta score 0.045, below the VCEP no-predicted-splice-impact cutoff of 0.2.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt; the flowchart is a rule document rather than a variant lookup table.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt; that file covers single amino acid in-frame deletions, not this missense variant.
Sources

Not assessed · 8 · no assessment recorded

PS1 VCEPNot assessed: no prior P222L variant established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP specifications is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP restricts PS1 to a same-amino-acid change previously established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP specifications, with no RNA or SpliceAI difference. The available exact P222L reports do not establish a prior pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator: PMID:17724467 reports P222L with temperature-dependent assay findings, and PMID:19336573 lists P222L as a neutral missense mutation. No qualifying prior pathogenic P222L assertion is available in the supplied evidence, so PS1 cannot be adjudicated.

VCEP rule
This rule code can only be used to compare variants asserted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic following the ClinGen _TP53_ VCEP’s specifications. Must confirm there is no difference using RNA data or SpliceAI (SpliceAI < 0.2).
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PS1 rule: same-amino-acid comparison is limited to variants asserted as Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic following the TP53 VCEP specifications, and splicing must be excluded with RNA data or SpliceAI < 0.2.
  • PMID:17724467, Results and Table 1: exact P222L was studied in yeast; activity nearly reached wild-type at 35 °C and the paper does not establish the variant as pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP.
  • PMID:19336573, Table 1, tumor sample B150: exact P222L was reported at 50% abundance and listed among neutral missense mutations; this does not establish a qualifying pathogenic comparator.
Still missing
  • A prior TP53 variant with the same p.Pro222Leu amino-acid change, independently established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP specifications, is not documented.
Sources
PS2 VCEPNot assessed: no documented de novo observation, parental testing, or qualifying PS2 point total is available for c.665C>T. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP assigns PS2 by the LFS-cancer point total for de novo observations, but the reviewed case evidence contains no documented proband de novo event, parental testing, parental phenotype, or qualifying PS2 points for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/p.P222L). The governing Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-and-PP1-Code-Application.pdf was searched for all three variant notations and contains no variant-specific entry; therefore PS2 cannot be evaluated from the available evidence.

VCEP rule
≥ 8 points ... 4-7 points ... 2-3 points ... 1 point
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence documents the normalized variant as NM_000546.6:c.665C>T, NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu)/p.(P222L), but provides no proband-parent trio result, de novo determination, or qualifying PS2 clinical point total.
  • The VCEP Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-Code-Application.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; no variant-specific entry was found.
  • PMID:17724467 and PMID:19336573 report somatic/tumor observations of P222L, not a documented germline de novo observation with parental testing.
Still missing
  • No documented de novo status or parental testing for the proband.
  • No proband cancer phenotype and corresponding VCEP PS2 point assignment were provided.
  • No variant-specific entry was found when Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-and-PP1-Code-Application.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L.
Sources
PS4 VCEPNot assessed: no VCEP-eligible proband phenotype or PS4 point total is available to compare with the Supporting 1-1.5-point threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP PS4 points table governs this criterion and assigns 0.5 points for Revised Chompret clinical criteria, 1 point for Classic LFS criteria, and 0.5 points for HER2-positive breast cancer under age 40, with total-point thresholds of Supporting 1-1.5, Moderate 2-3.5, Strong 4-7.5, and Very Strong >=8. The available case evidence does not provide an affected proband phenotype, LFS clinical-criteria assessment, or a PS4 point total. Literature reviewed for PS4 includes PMID:17724467, which reports P222L in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma sample with five somatic occurrences and zero germline occurrences in IARC, and PMID:19336573, which reports P222L in one BRCA1-related breast tumor; neither provides a VCEP-eligible germline LFS proband count or unaffected/population control comparison. PMID:12826609, PMID:17392385, and PMID:20065170 were also reviewed as PS4 candidate papers but do not provide variant-specific case-control or LFS proband evidence. Therefore PS4 cannot be assigned from the available evidence.

VCEP rule
≥ 8 points ... ≥ 4-7.5 points ... 2-3.5 points ... 1-1.5 points
Evidence considered
  • PS4-Points-Table.pdf, PS4 Code Strength Based on Total Points: PS4_Supporting = 1-1.5, PS4_Moderate = 2-3.5, PS4 = 4-7.5, PS4_Very Strong >= 8.
  • PS4-Points-Table.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; no variant-specific row or pre-assigned code was found.
  • PMID:17724467, Results/Table 1: P222L was reported in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma sample, with five somatic occurrences and zero germline occurrences in the IARC database; this is not a germline LFS proband case-control comparison.
  • PMID:19336573, Table 1, tumor sample B150: P222L (50%) was reported in a BRCA1-related breast tumor; the paper does not provide an unaffected/population control comparison or VCEP PS4 proband point assessment.
  • PMID:12826609 was reviewed as a PS4 candidate but does not explicitly mention P222L or provide variant-specific case-control evidence.
  • PMID:17392385 and PMID:20065170 were reviewed as PS4 candidates but do not mention the specific variant or provide variant-specific case-control evidence.
Still missing
  • No affected-proband phenotype or LFS clinical-criteria data are available for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T.
  • No PS4 point total can be calculated from the available case evidence.
  • PS4-Points-Table.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; no variant-specific entry was found.
  • No eligible germline case-control comparison with affected-case and unaffected/population-control counts was identified in the reviewed papers.
Sources
PM5 VCEPNot assessed: no different residue-222 missense variant with the required VCEP-established pathogenic or likely pathogenic status is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP requires a different missense variant at the same amino-acid residue that was previously established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP specifications, without using PM5 for that prior classification; the VCEP also requires Grantham comparison and exclusion of splicing. The supplied evidence contains exact P222L reports but no qualifying different missense comparator at residue 222 with the required VCEP-established pathogenic or likely pathogenic status. The comparator candidate file contains zero same-residue candidates and reports a retrieval failure, so PM5 cannot be adjudicated from the available evidence.

VCEP rule
Missense variant at an amino acid residue where 1 different missense variant previously determined to be pathogenic according to the _TP53_ VCEP’s specifications has been seen before. ... Missense variant at an amino acid residue where 1 different missense variant previously determined to be likely pathogenic according to the _TP53_ VCEP’s specifications has been seen before. **The previously seen likely pathogenic variant must have clinical data that demonstrates pathogenicity (i.e. PS2, PS4, PP1) in order for it to count towards PM5\_Supporting code application.**
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PM5 rule requires a different missense variant at the same amino-acid residue previously determined to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic under the TP53 VCEP specifications, with the prior classification reached without PM5; Grantham comparison and splicing exclusion are also required.
  • PMID:17724467 reports the assessed P222L variant itself, not a different residue-222 comparator, and does not establish a qualifying VCEP pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator.
  • PMID:19336573 reports the assessed P222L variant itself in Table 1, not a different residue-222 comparator.
  • PM5 candidate collection reports zero same-residue candidates; its retrieval error prevents treating that collection as definitive evidence of absence.
Still missing
  • A qualifying different TP53 missense comparator at residue 222, classified without PM5 under the TP53 VCEP specifications, is not available.
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot assessed: no affected-relative testing, family structure, or countable cosegregating meioses is documented for c.665C>T. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP requires documented cosegregation measured in meioses. The reviewed case evidence contains no affected relatives carrying NM_000546.6:c.665C>T, no unaffected relatives tested for the variant, no family structure, and no countable meioses. The governing Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-and-PP1-Code-Application.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L and has no variant-specific pre-assigned code. PP1 therefore cannot be assessed.

VCEP rule
Cosegregation must be observed in ≥ 7 meioses across > 1 family ... Cosegregation must be observed in 5-6 meioses in/across 1 or more families ... Cosegregation must be observed in 3-4 meioses in/across 1 or more families
Evidence considered
  • No affected-relative or unaffected-relative genotype, pedigree, segregation result, or meiosis count for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T was present in the reviewed case evidence.
  • The VCEP Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-and-PP1-Code-Application.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; no variant-specific entry was found.
  • PMID:17724467 and PMID:19336573 describe non-segregation-relevant somatic/tumor observations and do not provide family cosegregation data for this variant.
Still missing
  • No familial genotypes or phenotype-linked relative testing are available.
  • No family structure or countable meioses are available.
  • No variant-specific entry was found when Table-of-LFS-Cancers-and-Points-for-PS2-and-PP1-Code-Application.pdf was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot assessed: no qualifying variant observation has a reported VAF within the VCEP PP4 5-35% range. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP rule for PP4 requires an observation of the variant with VAF 5-35% for Supporting, or at least two independent observations with VAF 5-25% for Moderate. The available evidence contains no VAF measurement for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T and no qualifying independent VAF observations. The variant-specific reports reviewed here are a somatic tumor report and a yeast functional study, neither of which supplies the VAF evidence required by this VCEP PP4 rule.

VCEP rule
At least 2 independent observations of the variant with VAF 5-25%. ... Observation of the variant with VAF 5-35% (i.e., once or multiple times with VAF >25-35% and/or once with VAF 5-25%)
Evidence considered
  • The available case evidence does not report a VAF for c.665C>T/p.Pro222Leu/p.P222L.
  • PMID:17724467 reports P222L in a yeast assay and does not provide a qualifying clinical VAF.
  • PMID:19336573 reports P222L at an estimated 50% abundance in tumor sample B150, but this tumor abundance is not a qualifying VAF observation under the VCEP PP4 rule and does not establish the required independent observation design.
Still missing
  • No VAF measurement is available for a qualifying observation of NM_000546.6:c.665C>T.
  • No two independent observations with VAF 5-25% are available.
Sources
BS2 VCEPNot assessed: no qualifying single-source count of unrelated cancer-free females aged at least 60 years was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP BS2 rule requires documented unrelated females aged at least 60 years without cancer, all from one source, with strength determined by the count. The available evidence contains population allele counts and homozygote counts but does not document qualifying age, sex, cancer-free status, unrelatedness, or a single-source count. BS2 cannot therefore be evaluated.

VCEP rule
≥ 8 unrelated females who have reached at least 60 years of age without cancer. These individuals all must have come from a single source (single lab, database, etc). Cases cannot be counted across sources. Individuals with a diagnosis of sarcoma ≥ 61 years of age should not be counted towards the BS2 total. ... 4-7 unrelated females who have reached at least 60 years of age without cancer. These individuals all must have come from a single source (single lab, database, etc). Cases cannot be counted across sources. Individuals with a diagnosis of sarcoma ≥ 61 years of age should not be counted towards the BS2 total. ... 2-3 unrelated females who have reached at least 60 years of age without cancer. These individuals all must have come from a single source (single lab, database, etc). Cases cannot be counted across sources. Individuals with a diagnosis of sarcoma ≥ 61 years of age should not be counted towards the BS2 total.
Evidence considered
  • The available gnomAD records provide allele counts, ancestry frequencies, and homozygote counts, not the VCEP-required qualifying individual-level BS2 observations.
  • No evidence was available establishing unrelated females aged ≥60 years without cancer from one source.
Still missing
  • A single-source dataset documenting the number, sex, age, unrelatedness, and cancer-free status of qualifying individuals is required.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot assessed: no affected family members with LFS-associated cancers and discordant variant testing are documented for c.665C>T. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP defines BS4 as lack of segregation in affected family members diagnosed with LFS-associated cancers. The reviewed case evidence contains no affected-family-member genotypes, no family cancer histories linked to testing, and no documented non-segregation observation for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/p.P222L). BS4 cannot be assessed.

VCEP rule
Lack of segregation in affected family members (i.e. family members diagnosed with LFS-associated cancers as described in Table of LFS Cancers and Points for PS2 and PP1 Code Application).
Evidence considered
  • No affected-family-member genotype, LFS-associated cancer history linked to testing, or lack-of-segregation result for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T was present in the reviewed case evidence.
  • The VCEP table defining LFS-associated cancers for this evidence group was searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; no variant-specific entry was found.
  • The exact-variant papers reviewed (PMID:17724467 and PMID:19336573) do not report affected-family segregation or non-segregation data.
Still missing
  • No affected family members with qualifying LFS-associated cancers were documented as tested.
  • No discordant genotype-phenotype or other lack-of-segregation observation is available.
Sources
Not applicable · 12· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: c.665C>T produces the missense substitution p.Pro222Leu, whereas the TP53 PVS1 flowchart governs null-variant consequences. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is NM_000546.6:c.665C>T, NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu) (p.P222L), a missense substitution rather than a null, nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, or copy-number variant. The TP53 PVS1 flowchart is explicitly for null variants and assigns PVS1 only to the listed initiation, nonsense, frameshift, splice, deletion, or duplication consequences; therefore PVS1 is not applicable. No matching entry was found in either named PVS1 reference table.

VCEP rule
Figure 1. Flowchart for the application of PVS1 to TP53 null variants in relation to the transcript NM_000546.6.
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization: NM_000546.6:c.665C>T corresponds to NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu), also p.P222L, which is a missense substitution.
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP PVS1-Flowchart.pdf, Figure 1 caption: the flowchart applies PVS1 to TP53 null variants in relation to transcript NM_000546.6.
  • The PVS1-Flowchart.pdf rows specify PVS1 paths for initiation codon, nonsense or frameshift variants, canonical splice variants, deletions, and duplications; this missense substitution is none of those variant types.
  • The complete converted PVS1-Flowchart.pdf.txt and PVS1-Splicing-Worksheet.xlsx.txt were searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L; neither contained a matching variant entry.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L was found in PVS1-Flowchart.pdf.txt.
  • No entry for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L was found in PVS1-Splicing-Worksheet.xlsx.txt.
Sources
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP specification marks PM3 as Not Applicable, regardless of available phase or affected-proband observations. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen TP53 VCEP specification v2.4 marks PM3 as Not Applicable; therefore phase, affected-proband, and cis/trans observations cannot be used to apply PM3 under this governing framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP specification v2.4 cspec criteria entry for PM3: applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: p.Pro222Leu is a missense substitution, and the TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC marks PM4 Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC entry marks PM4 as Not Applicable. The case variant is the missense substitution p.Pro222Leu, not a protein-length-altering in-frame deletion, insertion, or other consequence to which PM4 could apply under the governing VCEP specification.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC entry for PM4: applicability is Not Applicable.
  • Case normalization identifies NM_000546.6:c.665C>T as NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu), a missense substitution with no protein-length change.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP explicitly designates PM6 as not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP explicitly marks PM6 as Not Applicable. No PM6 evidence may be applied under the governing VCEP specification.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • The TP53 VCEP v2.4 CSPEC entry for PM6 states applicability: Not Applicable.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP explicitly marks PP2 as not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP marks PP2 as not applicable.

VCEP rule
Not applicable
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PP2 applicability is explicitly Not applicable.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP explicitly marks PP5 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP explicitly marks PP5 as Not Applicable. No PP5 assertion is made.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC entry for PP5 states applicability: Not Applicable.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP excludes BP1 because truncating variants account for only a portion of disease-causing variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP marks BP1 as not applicable and states that the rule does not apply because truncating variants account for only a portion of disease-causing variants.

VCEP rule
This rule code does not apply to these genes, as truncating variants account for only a portion of disease causing variants.
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP BP1 instruction: the rule code does not apply to these genes, as truncating variants account for only a portion of disease causing variants.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP specification marks BP2 as Not Applicable, regardless of cis/trans observations with another variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen TP53 VCEP specification v2.4 marks BP2 as Not Applicable; therefore observations of the variant in cis or trans with another variant cannot be used to apply BP2 under this governing framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP specification v2.4 cspec criteria entry for BP2: applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: p.Pro222Leu is a missense substitution, and the TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC marks BP3 Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC entry marks BP3 as Not Applicable. The case variant is the missense substitution p.Pro222Leu, not an in-frame deletion in a repetitive region or another variant type covered by BP3.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen TP53 VCEP Version 2.4 CSPEC entry for BP3: applicability is Not Applicable.
  • Case normalization identifies NM_000546.6:c.665C>T as NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu), a missense substitution rather than an in-frame deletion in a repetitive region.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP explicitly marks BP5 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP explicitly marks BP5 as Not Applicable. No BP5 assertion is made.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC entry for BP5 states applicability: Not Applicable.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the TP53 VCEP explicitly marks BP6 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The TP53 VCEP explicitly marks BP6 as Not Applicable. No BP6 assertion is made.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC entry for BP6 states applicability: Not Applicable.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.665C>T is a missense variant producing p.Pro222Leu, whereas the VCEP BP7 rule covers only synonymous or intronic variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is limited by the VCEP to synonymous (silent) or intronic variants. NM_000546.6:c.665C>T produces p.Pro222Leu and is a missense variant, so BP7 is outside its governing scope and no splice prediction can make BP7 applicable.

VCEP rule
A (synonymous) silent or intronic variant for which RNA splicing assay data demonstrates no splicing aberration, as per recommendations from Walker et al., 2023 (PMID: 37352859). ... A synonymous (silent) outside of the core splice motif (last three nucleotides and first nucleotide of the exon) or intronic variant at or beyond +7 to -21 positions for which SpliceAI predicts no impact to the splice consensus nor the creation of a new splice site (BP4 is met, SpliceAI ≤ 0.1). No requirement to assess for nucleotide conservation for rule application as per evidence and recommendations in Walker et al., 2023 (PMID: 37352859).
Evidence considered
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_000546.6:c.665C>T as NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu)/p.(P222L), a missense substitution.
  • The exact variant notations were searched in the governing flowchart text and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel text; neither contains a matching row.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
TP53
Transcript
NM_000546.6
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000546.6:c.665C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu)
GRCh38
chr17:7674866 G>A
GRCh37
chr17:7578184 G>A
Location and type
Exon 6 · missense
ClinVar
161397
COSMIC
COSV52909202

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in TP53, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000546.6. Select a row to find it on the plot.

TP53NM_000546.6
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 19 / 1,613,970 alleles AF 1.18e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 8.78e-06
gnomAD v2.1 6 / 282,714 alleles AF 2.12e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.24e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.2e-05 · 19 / 1,613,970 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 8.8e-06
South Asian2 / 91,088 2.2e-05
European (non-Finnish)17 / 1,179,980 1.4e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 8 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 2.1e-05 · 6 / 282,714 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.2e-05
Remaining individuals1 / 7,224 0.00014
South Asian1 / 30,604 3.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)4 / 129,082 3.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 5 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish).

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.17722e-05; MAF= 0.00118%, 19/1613970 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 2.19568e-05; MAF= 0.00220%, 2/91088 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.78e-06.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 2.12229e-05; MAF= 0.00212%, 6/282714 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000138427; MAF= 0.01384%, 1/7224 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.242e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +88 bp
0.012
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +38 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -12 bp
0.045
SpliceAI donor gainat +22 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.036
Pangolin splice gain
0.020

Other predictors

REVEL
0.585
BayesDel
0.225

How the predictions were used

PP3 VCEPNot met: the VCEP table assigns c.665C>T "No evidence" with BayesDel class C0, despite a score of 0.224549, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.045. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/P222L). The governing TP53 PP3-BP4 spreadsheet contains the exact row c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu: BayesDel class C0, BayesDel score 0.224549, assigned code "No evidence," and splice value 0.05. The VCEP missense PP3 paths require either aGVGD C65 with BayesDel >= 0.16 for moderate strength or aGVGD C25-C55 with BayesDel >= 0.16 for supporting strength; the row is C0 and is explicitly pre-assigned "No evidence." SpliceAI is available with maximum delta score 0.045, below the VCEP splice-effect threshold of 0.2, so the splice path is not met either. The flowchart and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel spreadsheet were searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L and had no matching entry; the deletion spreadsheet is outside this missense variant's scope.

VCEP rule
**Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants)_ aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel score ≥ 0.16 ... **Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants)_ aGVGD class C25-C55 and BayesDel score ≥ 0.16 **Exonic (including silent variants and apparent “missense” variants or “single amino acid inframe deletions” for which there is a predicted splice effect) or Intronic Splice Variants (excluding ± 1,2 positions):** SpliceAI ≥ 0.2
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4-codes.xlsx, Supplementary Table S2 row: c.665C>T | p.Pro222Leu | Class C0 | BayesDel 0.224549 | No evidence | 0.05.
  • The exact variant was searched as c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L in the governing PP3/BP4 lookup, flowchart text, and single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel text.
  • SpliceAI Lookup for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T: DS_AG 0.0, DS_AL 0.012, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.045; maximum delta score 0.045.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt; the flowchart is a rule document rather than a variant lookup table.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt; that file covers single amino acid in-frame deletions, not this missense variant.
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: BayesDel 0.224549 exceeds the VCEP BP4 supporting cutoff of <0.16, although SpliceAI max delta 0.045 is below 0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000546.6:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu/P222L). The governing TP53 PP3-BP4 spreadsheet contains the exact row c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu with BayesDel class C0, BayesDel score 0.224549, assigned code "No evidence," and splice value 0.05. The VCEP missense BP4 supporting path requires BayesDel < 0.16 and > -0.008, except that C65 cannot receive BP4, together with SpliceAI < 0.2; the observed BayesDel score is 0.224549 and therefore fails the required BayesDel interval. BP4 moderate also requires BayesDel <= -0.008 and is not met. The exact lookup row's pre-assigned "No evidence" governs. The flowchart and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel spreadsheet were searched for c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, and p.P222L and had no matching entry; the deletion spreadsheet is outside this missense variant's scope.

VCEP rule
**Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants):_ BayesDel ≤ -0.008 irrespective of aGVGD score (except C65, in this case do not apply BP4_Moderate) AND no predicted differences in splicing (SpliceAI < 0.2) **Missense variants** _(See flowchart for application of PP3 and BP4 rules for missense variants):_ BayesDel < 0.16 and > -0.008 irrespective of aGVGD score (except C65, this case do not apply BP4) AND no predicted differences in splicing (SpliceAI < 0.2)
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4-codes.xlsx, Supplementary Table S2 row: c.665C>T | p.Pro222Leu | Class C0 | BayesDel 0.224549 | No evidence | 0.05.
  • SpliceAI Lookup for NM_000546.6:c.665C>T: maximum delta score 0.045, below the VCEP no-predicted-splice-impact cutoff of 0.2.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt; the flowchart is a rule document rather than a variant lookup table.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt; that file covers single amino acid in-frame deletions, not this missense variant.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.665C>T is a missense variant producing p.Pro222Leu, whereas the VCEP BP7 rule covers only synonymous or intronic variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is limited by the VCEP to synonymous (silent) or intronic variants. NM_000546.6:c.665C>T produces p.Pro222Leu and is a missense variant, so BP7 is outside its governing scope and no splice prediction can make BP7 applicable.

VCEP rule
A (synonymous) silent or intronic variant for which RNA splicing assay data demonstrates no splicing aberration, as per recommendations from Walker et al., 2023 (PMID: 37352859). ... A synonymous (silent) outside of the core splice motif (last three nucleotides and first nucleotide of the exon) or intronic variant at or beyond +7 to -21 positions for which SpliceAI predicts no impact to the splice consensus nor the creation of a new splice site (BP4 is met, SpliceAI ≤ 0.1). No requirement to assess for nucleotide conservation for rule application as per evidence and recommendations in Walker et al., 2023 (PMID: 37352859).
Evidence considered
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_000546.6:c.665C>T as NP_000537.3:p.(Pro222Leu)/p.(P222L), a missense substitution.
  • The exact variant notations were searched in the governing flowchart text and the single-amino-acid-deletions BayesDel text; neither contains a matching row.
Still missing
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in Flowchart-for-application-of-PP3%2C-BP4%2C-and-BP7.pdf.txt.
  • No c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu, or p.P222L entry was found in TP53-single-amino-acid-deletions-BayesDel-scores-(1).xlsx.txt.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04). REVEL score = 0.585. BayesDel score = 0.224549.

8 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Analysis of transactivation capability and conformation of p53 temperature-dependent mutants and their reactivation by amifostine in yeast.
    Grochova D et al. · 2008 Feb 21
    The paper explicitly studied TP53 P222L, corresponding to c.665C>T, in yeast functional assays. P222L was identified in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma sample, listed with five reported somatic occurrences and zero germline occurrences in the IARC database, and showed transactivation activity that nearly reached wild-type levels at 35 °C.
    → BS3 · strong Names this variant
    PMID 17724467 ↗
    Source detail
    Activity of some mutants almost reached the same level as the p53wt at 35 1C (P222L)

    Location Results, “Transactivation by temperature-dependent p53 mutants in yeast”; Table 1

    Context Yeast-based p53 transactivation assays using RGC-, p21-, and bax-derived response elements at 25, 30, and 35 °C; conformation assessed by PAb1620/PAb240 immunoprecipitation and densitometry.

Other recorded publications

  • Rescuing the function of mutant p53.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 11900253 ↗
  • Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigen
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 8023157 ↗
  • Understanding the function-structure and function-mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis.
    Kato S et al. · 2003
    This paper reports the VCEP's primary systematic yeast transactivation assay covering 2,314 TP53 missense mutants, but the supplied extraction does not explicitly mention P222L or provide a variant-specific P222L result.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 12826609 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Overall, one-third (36.0%) of the p53 mutants were functionally inactive. Approximately two-thirds (64.0%) of the mutants in the core domain of p53 were inactive, whereas activity was mostly unaffected by both NH2- and COOH-terminal mutations, except for a significant number of inactivating mutations within the tetramerization domain.

    Results, "Evaluation of 2,314 Missense Mutations on Sequence-Specific Transactivation," paragraph 1

  • Lack of correlation between p53-dependent transcriptional activity and the ability to induce apoptosis among 179 mutant p53s.
    Kakudo Y et al. · 2005
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 15781620 ↗
  • American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct t
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 17392385 ↗
  • High incidence of protein-truncating TP53 mutations in BRCA1-related breast cancer.
    Holstege H et al. · 2009
    The paper explicitly reports TP53 P222L in breast tumor sample B150 at an estimated 50% abundance and lists it among neutral missense mutations; the study used direct sequencing of TP53 exons 2–9 and p53 immunohistochemistry.
    Names this variant
    PMID 19336573 ↗
    Quoted passage
    P222L (50%)

    Table 1, tumor sample B150

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genom
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20065170 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.17722e-05; MAF= 0.00118%, 19/1613970 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 2.19568e-05; MAF= 0.00220%, 2/91088 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.78e-06.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 2.12229e-05; MAF= 0.00212%, 6/282714 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000138427; MAF= 0.01384%, 1/7224 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.242e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (10 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (4 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Uncertain Significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 161397)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04). REVEL score = 0.585. BayesDel score = 0.224549.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV52909202, n = 5 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.