Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
GNA11
Final classification
VUS
GNA11 c.892C>T · p.Pro298Ser
GNA11

NM_002067.5:c.892C>T (p.Pro298Ser) in GNA11 is a missense variant absent from gnomAD population databases (PM2).

Gene
GNA11
Transcript
NM_002067.5
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002067.5:c.892C>T
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr19:3120991 C>T
GRCh37
chr19:3120989 C>T
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
GNA11 c.892C>T

NM_002067.5:c.892C>T (p.Pro298Ser) in GNA11 is a missense variant absent from gnomAD population databases (PM2).1 The variant has been observed in COSMIC (COSV50138421, n=3) in somatic cancers but is absent from ClinVar with no germline classification available.2 In silico predictors are conflicting: REVEL score 0.535 is borderline damaging while BayesDel score -0.247 is benign; SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00). Neither PP3 nor BP4 is met.3 No functional studies, segregation data, de novo reports, or phenotype-specific evidence were identified for this variant.4 With only PM2 (moderate) met and no supporting pathogenic or benign criteria, the variant does not meet any ACMG/AMP classification combination and defaults to Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules.5

PM2 VUS
3 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
5 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_002067.5 · variants mapped to exon structure
GNA11 NM_002067.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 21 assessed
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate Pathogenic
NM_002067.5:c.892C>T is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (allele frequency = 0%). Meets PM2 threshold (<0.1% in population databases) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1 (AC=0).Absent from gnomAD v4.1 (AC=0).Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AC=0).
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No previously established pathogenic variant at amino acid position 298 has been identified.
PS2 No de novo data available for this variant.
PS3 No variant-specific functional studies identified.
PS4 No case-control or prevalence data available.
PM1 Position 298 is not a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org.
PM6 No de novo data available for NM_002067.5:c.892C>T.
PP1 No co-segregation data available.
PP2 HCI prior data not available for GNA11 (gene not supported by the predictor).
PP3 In silico predictors are conflicting: REVEL 0.535 (borderline damaging, just above 0.5 threshold), BayesDel -0.247 (benign), SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splicing impact).
PP4 No patient phenotype data available to assess whether the clinical presentation is specific for a GNA11-related disorder.
PP5 Absent from ClinVar.
Benign
BA1 Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD (v2.1, v4.1, Canada), well below the BA1 threshold of >1%.
BS1 Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD, below the BS1 threshold of >0.3% for non-VCEP assessment.
BS2 Variant is absent from population databases; cannot confirm observation in healthy adults.
BS3 No functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect were identified.
BS4 No segregation data available.
BP1 GNA11 has established gain-of-function missense mutations (e.g., Q209, R183) causing constitutive activation in somatic disease and missense variants associated with germline vascular malformations.
BP2 No data on trans configuration with a known pathogenic variant.
BP4 In silico evidence is conflicting: REVEL 0.535 is borderline damaging (>0.5 threshold), while BayesDel -0.247 is confidently benign (<0).
BP5 No alternate molecular basis identified.
BP6 Absent from ClinVar.
N/A · 3 PVS1 · PM5 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.535. BayesDel score = -0.246968.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. GNA11, a G protein subunit, is recurrently mutated in uveal melanoma.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV50138421, n = 3 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots